On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:11 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:30 AM Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 00:22, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:57:42PM +0100, David Wronek wrote: > > > > Document the compatible for the UFS found on SC7180. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: David Wronek <davidwronek@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > Should have been picked up by SCSI/UFS maintainers, but it > > > hasn't, so I applied it. > > > > And it now triggers schema warnings, because sc7180-ufshc has 7 clocks > > and 1 reg entries. > > And now dropped... Perhaps the dts changes should be too. > > Maybe QCom maintainers should require a report of dtbs_check on new > boards. My comparisons of Linus vs. next warnings often show an > increase in QCom warnings. Like right now: > > linus: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom:1990:265 > next: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom:1610:298 Still a bunch of warnings in next. This binding should be resubmitted with fixes or the dts changes dropped. Rob
