Re: [PATCH] X.509: Introduce scope-based x509_certificate allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> But why? The cleanup.h insists on having an explicit check, so call will be
> ignored completely on the branches when it's not needed. This is the pattern
> that is currently being used. Why do we need a deviation here?

Well he was talking about eliminating duplicate checks, and one
way of doing that is by moving it into the cleanup function.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux