On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 02:31:05PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Sure, I only queued it because you gave Acked-by for 05/50 and this is an
> obvious dependency. I would like to get things in as they are ready
> (whenever it makes sense), so if you want to include those two in the x86
> tree for 6.8, that would work for me.
It doesn't make sense to include them into 6.8 because the two alone are
simply dead code in 6.8.
The plan is to put the x86 patches first in the next submission, I'll
pick them up for 6.9 and then give you an immutable branch to apply the
KVM bits ontop. This way it all goes together.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
