On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 14:25 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Doesn't this imply the simulation is not complete Kind of? > and you need to add > clock jitter for the simulation to be more useful? > No, it's more _intentionally_ incomplete. This works fine in normal ARCH=um, but with time-travel variants we have more of a discrete event- based simulation, to integrates well with other things (e.g. SystemC or similar based device simulations). So this is quite intentional, and yes, it breaks in a few spots such as this one. johannes
