On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:16:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > + Architecture: riscv64 using:
> > + - Zvbb vector extension (XTS)
> > + - Zvkb vector crypto extension (CTR/XTS)
> > + - Zvkg vector crypto extension (XTS)
> > + - Zvkned vector crypto extension
>
> Maybe list Zvkned first since it's the most important one in this context.
BTW, I'd like to extend this request to the implementation names
(.cra_driver_name) and the names of the files as well. I.e., instead of:
aes-riscv64-zvkned
aes-riscv64-zvkb-zvkned
aes-riscv64-zvbb-zvkg-zvkned
sha256-riscv64-zvkb-zvknha_or_zvknhb
sha512-riscv64-zvkb-zvknhb
... we'd have:
aes-riscv64-zvkned
aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvkb
aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvbb-zvkg
sha256-riscv64-zvknha_or_zvknhb-zvkb
sha512-riscv64-zvknhb-zvkb
and similarly for the cra_driver_name fields.
I think that's much more logical. Do you agree?
- Eric
