Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] firewall: introduce stm32_firewall framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/12/23 16:09, Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:

...

diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..900f3b052a66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "stm32_firewall.h"
+
+/* Corresponds to STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + firewall ID */
+#define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS		(STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + 1)
+
+static LIST_HEAD(firewall_controller_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(firewall_controller_list_lock);
+
+/* Firewall device API */
+int stm32_firewall_get_firewall(struct device_node *np, struct stm32_firewall *firewall,
+				unsigned int nb_firewall)
+{
+	struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl;
+	struct of_phandle_iterator it;
+	unsigned int i, j = 0;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!firewall || !nb_firewall)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Parse property with phandle parsed out */
+	of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, np, "feature-domains", "#feature-domain-cells", 0) {
+		struct of_phandle_args provider_args;
+		struct device_node *provider = it.node;
+		const char *fw_entry;
+		bool match = false;
+
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("Unable to get feature-domains property for node %s\n, err: %d",
+			       np->full_name, err);
+			of_node_put(provider);
+			return err;
+		}
+
+		if (j > nb_firewall) {
+			pr_err("Too many firewall controllers");
+			of_node_put(provider);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		provider_args.args_count = of_phandle_iterator_args(&it, provider_args.args,
+								    STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS);
+
+		/* Check if the parsed phandle corresponds to a registered firewall controller */
+		mutex_lock(&firewall_controller_list_lock);
+		list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &firewall_controller_list, entry) {
+			if (ctrl->dev->of_node->phandle == it.phandle) {
+				match = true;
+				firewall[j].firewall_ctrl = ctrl;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(&firewall_controller_list_lock);
+
+		if (!match) {
+			firewall[j].firewall_ctrl = NULL;
+			pr_err("No firewall controller registered for %s\n", np->full_name);
+			of_node_put(provider);
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+
+		err = of_property_read_string_index(np, "feature-domain-names", j, &fw_entry);
+		if (err == 0)
+			firewall[j].entry = fw_entry;
+
+		/* Handle the case when there are no arguments given along with the phandle */
+		if (provider_args.args_count < 0 ||
+		    provider_args.args_count > STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS) {
+			of_node_put(provider);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		} else if (provider_args.args_count == 0) {
+			firewall[j].extra_args_size = 0;
+			firewall[j].firewall_id = U32_MAX;
+			j++;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* The firewall ID is always the first argument */
+		firewall[j].firewall_id = provider_args.args[0];
+
+		/* Extra args start at the third argument */
+		for (i = 0; i < provider_args.args_count; i++)
+			firewall[j].extra_args[i] = provider_args.args[i + 1];

Hi Gatien,

Above it is checked that the maximum value of provider_args.args_count is
STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS.
So here the maximum value of i is STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS - 1.

STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS is defined as STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + 1
And STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS is defined as 5.
So the maximum value of i is (5 + 1 - 1) = 5.

firewall[j] is of type struct stm32_firewall.
And its args field has STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS (5) elements.
Thus the maximum valid index is (5 - 1) = 4.

But the line above may access index 5.

Flagged by Smatch.


Hi Simon,

Thank you for pointing this out.

I'll correct it for V5.

Best regards,
Gatien
+
+		/* Remove the firewall ID arg that is not an extra argument */
+		firewall[j].extra_args_size = provider_args.args_count - 1;
+
+		j++;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_get_firewall);

...

diff --git a/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7b4450a8ec15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved
+ */
+
+#ifndef STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H
+#define STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H
+
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS		5
+
+/* Opaque reference to stm32_firewall_controller */
+struct stm32_firewall_controller;
+
+/**
+ * struct stm32_firewall - Information on a device's firewall. Each device can have more than one
+ *			   firewall.
+ *
+ * @firewall_ctrl:		Pointer referencing a firewall controller of the device. It is
+ *				opaque so a device cannot manipulate the controller's ops or access
+ *				the controller's data
+ * @extra_args:			Extra arguments that are implementation dependent
+ * @entry:			Name of the firewall entry
+ * @extra_args_size:		Number of extra arguments
+ * @firewall_id:		Firewall ID associated the device for this firewall controller
+ */
+struct stm32_firewall {
+	struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_ctrl;
+	u32 extra_args[STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS];
+	const char *entry;
+	size_t extra_args_size;
+	u32 firewall_id;
+};

...



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux