Thanks for your suggestion. I will update the patch and remove retry in v3.
On 2023/9/4 13:40, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:28:08AM +0800, Guozihua (Scott) wrote:
On 2023/8/23 17:28, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:30:47AM +0000, Lu Jialin wrote:
In order to resolve the problem, we retry at most 5 times when
padata_do_parallel return -EBUSY. For more than 5 times, we replace the
return err -EBUSY with -EAGAIN, which means parallel_data is changing, and
the caller should call it again.
Steffen, should we retry this at all? Or should it just fail as it
did before?
Thanks,
It should be fine if we don't retry and just fail with -EAGAIN and let
caller handles it. It should not break the meaning of the error code.
Just failing without a retry should be ok.
