Andrei Coardos (aboutphysycs@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/char/hw_random/ba431-rng.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/ba431-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/ba431-rng.c
> index 5b7ca0416490..b1518dd52a24 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/ba431-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/ba431-rng.c
> @@ -189,8 +189,6 @@ static int ba431_trng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ba431->rng.cleanup = ba431_trng_cleanup;
> ba431->rng.read = ba431_trng_read;
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ba431);
> -
> ret = devm_hwrng_register(&pdev->dev, &ba431->rng);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "BA431 registration failed (%d)\n", ret);
> --
> 2.34.1
This was already removed in e8c1fdcc62d3 ("hwrng: ba431 - do not set
drvdata").
