On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:34 PM Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2023-08-17 16:33, Lucas Segarra Fernandez wrote: ... > Some comment about the name: > > ARRAY_SIZE() is rather ambiguous, as there's array_size()[1], which means the > number of bytes needed to represent the array. I suggest a name based on > > - _Lengthof() It has been proposed to ISO C to get the number of elements > of an array: > <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2529.pdf>. > > - sizeof_field() The kernel macro for the size of a struct member > > So, how about lengthof_field()? TBH I do not understand the motivation of making this kind of confusion and inconsistency. Are you suggesting renaming ARRAY_SIZE() to begin with? If so, it's definitely out of the scope of this series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
