On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:22:58AM +0000, Azeem Shaikh wrote:
> diff --git a/crypto/lrw.c b/crypto/lrw.c
> index 1b0f76ba3eb5..bb8c1575645b 100644
> --- a/crypto/lrw.c
> +++ b/crypto/lrw.c
> @@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ static int lrw_create(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb)
> if (!strncmp(cipher_name, "ecb(", 4)) {
> unsigned len;
>
> - len = strlcpy(ecb_name, cipher_name + 4, sizeof(ecb_name));
> - if (len < 2 || len >= sizeof(ecb_name))
> + len = strscpy(ecb_name, cipher_name + 4, sizeof(ecb_name));
> + if (len < 2)
> goto err_free_inst;
This is wrong because 'len' is unsigned. So the -EFBIG return value is not
being checked for, so this patch actually removes the overflow check.
It looks like you've sent over 60 strscpy conversion patches recently
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/?q=f%3Aazeemshaikh38+s%3Astrscpy).
That's concerning because this is the only one that I happened to review, and it
introduces a bug. There are 60 others that could have this same bug. Can you
please review all your patches for this same bug?
- Eric
