Re: Did the in-kernel Camellia or CMAC crypto implementation break?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Actually, I was wondering about that.  I see that all the testing data seems
> > to be statically loaded in testmgr.[ch], even if the algorithms to be tested
> > are resident in modules that aren't loaded yet (so it's kind of test "on
> > demand").  I guess it can't be split up amongst the algorithm modules as some
> > of the tests require stuff from multiple modules (eg. aes + cbs + cts).
> 
> Yes I've been meaning to split this up so they're colocated with
> the generic implementation.

I don't suppose you have anything to look at for this?  Should I leave my
testing stuff as it is for now until you've attempted this?

David





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux