Re: [PATCH V4 22/23] platform/surface: Disable for RISC-V

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:33:00AM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On 4/4/23 20:20, Sunil V L wrote:
> > With CONFIG_ACPI enabled for RISC-V, this driver gets enabled
> > in allmodconfig build. However, RISC-V doesn't support sub-word
> > atomics which is used by this driver. Due to this, the build fails
> > with below error.
> > 
> > In function ‘ssh_seq_next’,
> >      inlined from ‘ssam_request_write_data’ at drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/controller.c:1483:8:
> > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:399:45: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_335’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG failed
> >    399 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> >        |                                             ^
> > ./include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
> >     78 | # define unlikely(x)    __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
> >        |                                             ^
> > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:387:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
> >    387 |         __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
> >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:399:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
> >    399 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
> >     39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> >        |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/build_bug.h:59:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
> >     59 | #define BUILD_BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "BUILD_BUG failed")
> >        |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:335:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG’
> >    335 |                 BUILD_BUG();                                            \
> >        |                 ^~~~~~~~~
> > ./arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:344:30: note: in expansion of macro ‘__cmpxchg’
> >    344 |         (__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr),                           \
> >        |                              ^~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1916:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘arch_cmpxchg’
> >   1916 |         arch_cmpxchg(__ai_ptr, __VA_ARGS__); \
> >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/controller.c:61:32: note: in expansion of macro ‘cmpxchg’
> >     61 |         while (unlikely((ret = cmpxchg(&c->value, old, new)) != old)) {
> >        |                                ^~~~~~~
> > 
> > So, disable this driver for RISC-V even when ACPI is enabled for now.
> 
> CONFIG_SURFACE_PLATFORMS should be enabled for ARM64 || X86 || COMPILE_TEST only,
> so I guess the issue only happens when compiling with the latter enabled?
> 
> I'm not aware of any current plans of MS to release RISC-V-based Surface
> devices, so you could maybe also just explicitly disable CONFIG_SURFACE_PLATFORMS.
> In any case, I don't see any issues with disabling the whole platform/surface
> or only individual drivers for RISC-V, so for either solution:
> 
> Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
Hi Maximilian,

Thanks!. Yes, COMPILE_TEST gets enabled for allmodconfig builds. Since
the whole intention of COMPILE_TEST appears to be able to compile-test
drivers on a platform than they are supposed to be used, I think it is
better not to skip whole set of drivers but only that which can not build.
So, I prefer to keep this change as is.

Thanks,
Sunil



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux