On 16/02/2023 14:14, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Introduce a generic IP family compatible 'qcom,qce' and its two derivatives > based on SoC names rather than on IP versions. Having a generic compatible > is only partially sufficient, the QCE IP version can be discovered in > runtime, however there are two known groups of QCE IP versions, which > require different DT properties, these two groups are populated with SoC > based compatibles known at the moment. > > Keep the old compatibles 'qcom,crypto-v5.1' and 'qcom,crypto-v5.4' for > backward compatibility of DTB ABI, but mark them as deprecated. > As I asked at v9, please mention that you document already used v5.4 compatible. You do not "keep it", because it was never there in the binding. Best regards, Krzysztof
