Re: [PATCH 1/1] ice: Change assigning method of the CPU affinity masks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:39:20AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Pawel Chmielewski wrote:

...

> > +	v_idx = 0;
> > +	for_each_numa_hop_mask(aff_mask, numa_node) {
> > +		for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, aff_mask, last_aff_mask)
> > +			if (v_idx < vsi->num_q_vectors) {
> > +				if (cpu_online(cpu))
> > +					cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &vsi->q_vectors[v_idx]->affinity_mask);
> > +				v_idx++;
> > +			}

>                         else
>                                 goto out;

In this case the inverted conditional makes more sense:

			if (v_idx >= vsi->num_q_vectors)
				goto out;

			if (cpu_online(cpu))
				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &vsi->q_vectors[v_idx]->affinity_mask);
			v_idx++;

(indentation level will be decreased).

> > +		last_aff_mask = aff_mask;
> > +	}
> > +
>         out:
> 
> >  	return 0;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux