On 01/02/23 23:52, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote: >> From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxx> >> >> Pre-boot guest payload needs to be encrypted and VMM has copied it > > "has to have copied it over" I presume? True, payload is being copied in patch 10/64 now. >> over to the private-fd. Add support to get the pfn from the memfile fd >> for encrypting the payload in-place. > > Why is that a good thing? > > I guess with UPM you're supposed to get the PFN of that encrypted guest > payload from that memslot. > > IOW, such commit messages are too laconic for my taste and you could try > to explain more why this is happening instead of me having to > "reverse-deduce" what you're doing from the code... > I am updating the SEV related patches, will add more details in commit and send. Regards Nikunj
