> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 11:10 AM
> To: Neal Liu <neal_liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; David
> S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] crypto: aspeed: fix type warnings
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 10:56:00AM +0800, Neal Liu wrote:
> >
> > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int aspeed_acry_rsa_ctx_copy(struct
> > aspeed_acry_dev *acry_dev, void *buf, static int
> > aspeed_acry_rsa_transfer(struct aspeed_acry_dev *acry_dev) {
> > struct akcipher_request *req = acry_dev->req;
> > - u8 *sram_buffer = (u8 *)acry_dev->acry_sram;
> > + u8 *sram_buffer = (u8 __force *)acry_dev->acry_sram;
>
> Wouldn't it be better to keep the iomem marker and then use readb on
> sram_buffer?
>
This way works too.
I cannot tell which way is better. Do you prefer to keep the iomem marker?
Thanks
-Neal
