On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:17:41PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> In the case of SEV, it would still be up to userspace whether or not it
> actually wants to make use of UPM functionality like KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> and private memslots. Otherwise, to maintain backward-compatibility,
> userspace can do things as it has always done and continue running SEV without
> relying on private memslots/KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES or any of the new ioctls.
>
> For SNP however it is required that userspace uses/implements UPM
> functionality.
Makes sense to me.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
