Hi 12 janvier 2023 à 18:07 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit: > Sorry Yann, but I'm not interested in this approach, and I don't think > reviewing the details of it are a good allocation of time. I don't > want to lock the kernel into having specific reseeding semantics that > are a contract with userspace, which is what this approach does. This patch adds a mean for the kernel to tell userspace: between the last time you call us with getrandom(timestamp,, GRND_TIMESTAMP), something happened that trigger an update to the opaque cookie given to getrandom(timestamp, GRND_TIMESTAMP). When such update happen, userspace is advised to discard buffered random data and retry. The meaning of the timestamp cookie is up to the kernel, and can be changed anytime. Userspace is not expected to read the content of this blob. Userspace only acts on the length returned by getrandom(,, GRND_TIMESTAMP): -1 : not supported 0 : cookie not updated, no need to discard buffered data >0 : cookie updated, userspace should discard buffered data For the cookie, I've used a single u64, but two u64 could be a better start, providing room for implementing improved behavior in future kernel versions. > Please just let me iterate on my original patchset for a little bit, > without adding more junk to the already overly large conversation. I like the simplicity of my so called "junk". It's streamlined, doesn't require a new syscall, doesn't require a new copy of ChaCha20 code. I'm sorry it doesn't fit your expectations. Regards. -- Yann Droneaud OPTEYA
