RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add TRNG node for VisionFive 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 10 January, 2023 3:37 PM
> To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Herbert Xu
> <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Emil Renner
> Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add TRNG node for VisionFive
> 2
> 
> >> Which clock source is this? I see syscrg and aoncrg in the v3
> >> devicetree:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-7-
> >> hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> Have a missed a patchset which adds support for this particular clock
> >> controller? At the very least, I don't think one has reached the
> >> linux-riscv mailing list.
> >> The clock driver patchset only has aoncrg & syscrg:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220005054.34518-1-
> >> hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >
> >Hi Conor,
> >
> >Thanks for reviewing the patches.
> >Yes, the patch for stg domain hasn't been submitted yet.
> >In this case should I drop this patch from the series until the related patches
> reach the mailing list?
> 
> Since it doesn't apply anyway, no harm keeping it IMO.
> Having the dts can make it easier, although not in this case, to look at the
> binding and driver.
> Just mention it in the cover letter if/when you send another version.
> 

Sure, I'll do this.

Thanks,
Jia Jie




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux