On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:47 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:29 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > I guess you missed the conversation with Borislav yesterday about that. > > > > > He mentioned that I'd just take it through random.git when this whole > > > > > series goes in. > > > > > > > > Please base your tree off on tip:x86/asm then (or pull it in) - it only > > > > > > My idea was a lot simpler: avoid the tree inter-dependency by us acking this > > > patch so that it can go through the random.git tree. > > > > Indeed I would prefer this. > > > > Or... just put this in 6.2 because it's trivial anyway? Heck, even mark > > it as stable@ so make future backporting easier. Then it'll meet tip's > > urgent criteria. > > Yeah - that's sensible too, it does fix a header namespace bug - I've put > it into tip:x86/urgent. Excellent, thanks. I'll rebase on that when it hits Linus' tree.
