Hi Thomas, On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:52:05PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29 2022 at 22:06, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hook up the generic vDSO implementation to the x86 vDSO data page. Since > > the existing vDSO infrastructure is heavily based on the timekeeping > > functionality, which works over arrays of bases, a new macro is > > introduced for vvars that are not arrays. > > > > The vDSO function requires a ChaCha20 implementation that does not write > > to the stack, yet can still do an entire ChaCha20 permutation, so > > provide this using SSE2, since this is userland code that must work on > > all x86-64 processors. > > Way more consumable and looks about right. Good. > Please take your time and > give others a chance to look at this lot before rushing out v11. That's my plan indeed. Now that the patch is reviewable, I'll let it sit for a while. In between v10 and v11, my scratch work will be in <https://git.zx2c4.com/linux-rng/log/?h=vdso>, which is rebased often. Thanks again for looking this over. Jason
