On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:56:23PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> -static void internal_polyval_update(const struct polyval_tfm_ctx *keys,
> +static inline struct polyval_tfm_ctx *polyval_tfm_ctx(const void *raw_ctx)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)raw_ctx;
> + unsigned long align = POLYVAL_ALIGN;
> +
> + if (align <= crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment())
> + align = 1;
> + return (struct polyval_tfm_ctx *)ALIGN(addr, align);
> +}
This could just use PTR_ALIGN. Also, checking for POLYVAL_ALIGN <=
crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() isn't necessary.
> +
> +static void internal_polyval_update(const void *raw_keys,
> const u8 *in, size_t nblocks, u8 *accumulator)
> {
> + const struct polyval_tfm_ctx *keys = polyval_tfm_ctx(raw_keys);
This is being passed a struct polyval_tfm_ctx. There's no need to cast it back
to a void pointer and align it again redundantly.
> if (likely(crypto_simd_usable())) {
> kernel_fpu_begin();
> clmul_polyval_update(keys, in, nblocks, accumulator);
> @@ -102,7 +117,8 @@ static int polyval_x86_update(struct shash_desc *desc,
> const u8 *src, unsigned int srclen)
> {
> struct polyval_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
> - const struct polyval_tfm_ctx *tctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm);
> + const struct polyval_tfm_ctx *tctx =
> + polyval_tfm_ctx(crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm));
> u8 *pos;
> unsigned int nblocks;
> unsigned int n;
It would make more sense to have the polyval_tfm_ctx() function take in the
struct crypto_shash.
How about using the following:
static inline struct polyval_tfm_ctx *polyval_tfm_ctx(struct crypto_shash *tfm)
{
return PTR_ALIGN(crypto_shash_ctx(tfm), POLYVAL_ALIGN);
}
- Eric
