Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86: Do not acquire fpu context for too long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Herbert,
Thanks a lot for your review!

On 10/4/22 13:52, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 04:49:12AM +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>>
>>   #define ECB_WALK_START(req, bsize, fpu_blocks) do {			\
>>   	void *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req));	\
>> +	unsigned int walked_bytes = 0;					\
>>   	const int __bsize = (bsize);					\
>>   	struct skcipher_walk walk;					\
>> -	int err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, (req), false);		\
>> +	int err;							\
>> +									\
>> +	err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, (req), false);			\
>>   	while (walk.nbytes > 0) {					\
>> -		unsigned int nbytes = walk.nbytes;			\
>> -		bool do_fpu = (fpu_blocks) != -1 &&			\
>> -			      nbytes >= (fpu_blocks) * __bsize;		\
>>   		const u8 *src = walk.src.virt.addr;			\
>> -		u8 *dst = walk.dst.virt.addr;				\
>>   		u8 __maybe_unused buf[(bsize)];				\
>> -		if (do_fpu) kernel_fpu_begin()
>> +		u8 *dst = walk.dst.virt.addr;				\
>> +		unsigned int nbytes;					\
>> +		bool do_fpu;						\
>> +									\
>> +		if (walk.nbytes - walked_bytes > ECB_CBC_WALK_MAX) {	\
>> +			nbytes = ECB_CBC_WALK_MAX;			\
>> +			walked_bytes += ECB_CBC_WALK_MAX;		\
>> +		} else {						\
>> +			nbytes = walk.nbytes - walked_bytes;		\
>> +			walked_bytes = walk.nbytes;			\
>> +		}							\
>> +									\
>> +		do_fpu = (fpu_blocks) != -1 &&				\
>> +			 nbytes >= (fpu_blocks) * __bsize;		\
>> +		if (do_fpu)						\
>> +			kernel_fpu_begin()
>>
>>   #define CBC_WALK_START(req, bsize, fpu_blocks)				\
>>   	ECB_WALK_START(req, bsize, fpu_blocks)
>> @@ -65,8 +81,12 @@
>>   } while (0)
>>
>>   #define ECB_WALK_END()							\
>> -		if (do_fpu) kernel_fpu_end();				\
>> +		if (do_fpu)						\
>> +			kernel_fpu_end();				\
>> +		if (walked_bytes < walk.nbytes)				\
>> +			continue;					\
>>   		err = skcipher_walk_done(&walk, nbytes);		\
>> +		walked_bytes = 0;					\
>>   	}								\
>>   	return err;							\
>>   } while (0)
>
> skcipher_walk_* is supposed to return at most a page.  Why is this
> necessary?
>
> Cheers,

I referred to below link.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/MW5PR84MB18426EBBA3303770A8BC0BDFAB759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Sorry for that I didn't check that skcipher_walk_* returns only under 4K sizes.
So, I thought fpu context would be too long.
But, I just checked the skcipher_walk_*, and it's right, it returns under 4K sizes.
So, there are no problems as you mentioned.

Thank you so much!
Taehee Yoo



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux