On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 08:51:02AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 8/4/22 08:37, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > Am 04.08.22 um 15:13 schrieb Tom Lendacky: > > > On 8/3/22 20:02, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > SEV-SNP does not initialize to a legit state, unless the firmware is > > > > loaded twice, when SEP API version < 1.43, and the firmware is updated > > > > to a later version. Because of this user space needs to work around > > > > this with "rmmod && modprobe" combo. Fix this by implementing the > > > > workaround to the driver. > > > > > > The SNP hypervisor patches are placing a minimum supported version > > > requirement for the SEV firmware that exceeds the specified version > > > above [1] (for the reason above, as well as some others), so this patch > > > is not needed, NAK. > > > > As described in the "Milan Release Notes.txt" of the AMD firmware update > > package amd_sev_fam19h_model0xh_1.33.03.zip. > > > > "If upgrading to 1.33.01 or later from something older (picking up > > CSF-1201), it is required that two Download Firmware commands be run to > > fix the "Committed Version" across the firmware. CSF-1201 fixed a bug > > where the committed version in the attestation report was incorrect. > > Performing a single Download Firmware will upgrade the firmware, but > > performing a second one will correct the committed version. This is a > > one-time upgrade issue. > > " > > > > Note that `1.33.01` is not the same version number as "1.51" in [1]. One > > is the firmware version, the other is the SEV-SNP API version. > > It is the same and are meant to correlate, the 33 is hex => 51. > > > > > I am definitely seeing a wrong TCB version, if the firmware is only > > updated once to `1.33.01` aka "1.51". > > Reloading the `ccp` module, which triggers another firmware load, cures > > the problem. > > > > The patch might be wrong, as it might not do the right thing, but the > > problem and the solution exist. > > > > What is your suggestion then to fix the wrong committed TCB version? > > Hmmm... ok, I see what you're saying. We don't want to have to make everyone > update their BIOS/firmware to get to a starting level above 1.43 to begin > with. > > Ok, let me review/comment on the patch. This was has a bug, and the reference to what Harald denoted is missing. Hold on for v2. I'll put it out soon. BR, Jarkko