Hi Vladimir, On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:52 PM Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On 7/13/22 15:40, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > >> I've just seen on the platform with slow(ish) timer that it is now considered > >> as a source of entropy with samples_per_bit set to 27 (5.19-rc6 has MAX_SAMPLES_PER_BIT > >> set to 32). Because of that I see significant delays and I'm trying to understand what > >> could be wrong with my setup. > >> > >> I observe one credit_init_bits(1) call (via entropy_timer()) per ~970 schedule() calls. > >> Is that somewhat expected? Does it make sense at all? > > > > How slow are we talking? Seconds? Minutes? Is it too slow? It's possible > > that MAX_SAMPLES_PER_BIT=32 is a bit high as a threshold and I should > > reduce that a bit. > > > > TBH, I run out of patience and never seen it completes, more then seconds. I just was > curious how much it is should take to get crng_ready() return true. Ooof. Yea, running this in a VM with various settings I can see that the current maximum is problematic. I'll fix that up and send a patch. Jason