[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Yes, this is fixed in 5.19 rebase.
Thanks,
Ashish
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 7:49 AM
To: Kalra, Ashish <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx>
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-coco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; jroedel@xxxxxxx; Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@xxxxxxx>; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; ardb@xxxxxxxxxx; pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx; luto@xxxxxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; slp@xxxxxxxxxx; pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx; peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx; dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; tobin@xxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; Roth, Michael <Michael.Roth@xxxxxxx>; vbabka@xxxxxxx; kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx; marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx; sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; alpergun@xxxxxxxxxx; dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 41/49] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:45:13PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:34:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > > From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > When SEV-SNP is enabled in the guest, the hardware places
> > > restrictions on all memory accesses based on the contents of the
> > > RMP table. When hardware encounters RMP check failure caused by
> > > the guest memory access it raises the #NPF. The error code
> > > contains additional information on the access type. See the APM volume 2 for additional information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 76
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 14 +++++---
> > > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c index
> > > 4ed90331bca0..7fc0fad87054 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > > @@ -4009,3 +4009,79 @@ void sev_post_unmap_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> > >
> > > spin_unlock(&sev->psc_lock);
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +void handle_rmp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64
> > > +error_code) {
> > > + int rmp_level, npt_level, rc, assigned;
> > > + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> > > + gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
> > > + bool need_psc = false;
> > > + enum psc_op psc_op;
> > > + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> > > + bool private;
> > > +
> > > + write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(!kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(vcpu, gpa, &pfn,
> > > +&npt_level)))
> >
> > This function does not exist. Should it be kvm_mmu_get_tdp_page?
>
> Ugh, ignore that.
>
> This the actual issue:
>
> $ git grep kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:bool kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *level) arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk);
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c: rc = kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(vcpu, gpa, &pfn, &npt_level);
>
> It's not declared in any header.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h index 0e1f4d92b89b..33267f619e61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ static inline void kvm_mmu_load_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_pfn_t kvm_mmu_map_tdp_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
u32 error_code, int max_level);
+bool kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *level):
+
/*
* Check if a given access (described through the I/D, W/R and U/S bits of a
* page fault error code pfec) causes a permission fault with the given PTE
BTW, kvm_mmu_map_tdp_page() ought to be in single line since it's less than
100 characters.
BR, Jarkko
