When kunpeng920 encryption driver is used to deencrypt and decrypt packets during the softirq, it is not allowed to use mutex lock. The kernel will report the following error: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/57/0/0x00000300 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e4 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0xd8/0x140 __schedule_bug+0x68/0x80 __schedule+0x728/0x840 schedule+0x50/0xe0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x24 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x594/0x5dc __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x30 mutex_lock+0x50/0x60 sec_request_init+0x8c/0x1a0 [hisi_sec2] sec_process+0x28/0x1ac [hisi_sec2] sec_skcipher_crypto+0xf4/0x1d4 [hisi_sec2] sec_skcipher_encrypt+0x1c/0x30 [hisi_sec2] crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xc8/0xfc [authenc] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 esp_output_tail+0x348/0x5c0 [esp4] esp_output+0x120/0x19c [esp4] xfrm_output_one+0x25c/0x4d4 xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1fc xfrm_output+0xac/0x3c0 xfrm4_output+0x64/0x130 ip_build_and_send_pkt+0x158/0x20c tcp_v4_send_synack+0xdc/0x1f0 tcp_conn_request+0x7d0/0x994 tcp_v4_conn_request+0x58/0x6c tcp_v6_conn_request+0xf0/0x100 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x1cc/0xd60 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x10c/0x250 tcp_v4_rcv+0xfc4/0x10a4 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xf4/0x200 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x58/0x70 ip_local_deliver+0x68/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x70/0x94 ip_list_rcv_finish.constprop.0+0x17c/0x1d0 ip_sublist_rcv+0x40/0xb0 ip_list_rcv+0x140/0x1dc __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x154/0x28c __netif_receive_skb_list+0x120/0x1a0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0xe4/0x1f0 napi_complete_done+0x70/0x1f0 gro_cell_poll+0x9c/0xb0 napi_poll+0xcc/0x264 net_rx_action+0xd4/0x21c __do_softirq+0x130/0x358 irq_exit+0x11c/0x13c __handle_domain_irq+0x88/0xf0 gic_handle_irq+0x78/0x2c0 el1_irq+0xb8/0x140 arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x40 default_idle_call+0x5c/0x1c0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x174/0x1b0 do_idle+0xc8/0x160 cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x11c secondary_start_kernel+0x158/0x1e4 softirq: huh, entered softirq 3 NET_RX 0000000093774ee4 with preempt_count 00000100, exited with fffffe00? V1: use spin_lock will cause soft lockup Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h | 2 +- drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h index 42bb486f3b6d..d2a0bc93e752 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct sec_qp_ctx { struct idr req_idr; struct sec_alg_res res[QM_Q_DEPTH]; struct sec_ctx *ctx; - struct mutex req_lock; + spinlock_t req_lock; struct list_head backlog; struct hisi_acc_sgl_pool *c_in_pool; struct hisi_acc_sgl_pool *c_out_pool; diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c index 6eebe739893c..71dfa7db6394 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static int sec_alloc_req_id(struct sec_req *req, struct sec_qp_ctx *qp_ctx) { int req_id; - mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); req_id = idr_alloc_cyclic(&qp_ctx->req_idr, NULL, 0, QM_Q_DEPTH, GFP_ATOMIC); - mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); if (unlikely(req_id < 0)) { dev_err(req->ctx->dev, "alloc req id fail!\n"); return req_id; @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static void sec_free_req_id(struct sec_req *req) qp_ctx->req_list[req_id] = NULL; req->qp_ctx = NULL; - mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); idr_remove(&qp_ctx->req_idr, req_id); - mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); } static u8 pre_parse_finished_bd(struct bd_status *status, void *resp) @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int sec_bd_send(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *req) !(req->flag & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG)) return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); ret = hisi_qp_send(qp_ctx->qp, &req->sec_sqe); if (ctx->fake_req_limit <= @@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ static int sec_bd_send(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *req) list_add_tail(&req->backlog_head, &qp_ctx->backlog); atomic64_inc(&ctx->sec->debug.dfx.send_cnt); atomic64_inc(&ctx->sec->debug.dfx.send_busy_cnt); - mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); return -EBUSY; } - mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) return -ENOBUFS; @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int sec_create_qp_ctx(struct hisi_qm *qm, struct sec_ctx *ctx, qp->req_cb = sec_req_cb; - mutex_init(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_lock_init(&qp_ctx->req_lock); idr_init(&qp_ctx->req_idr); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qp_ctx->backlog); @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static struct sec_req *sec_back_req_clear(struct sec_ctx *ctx, { struct sec_req *backlog_req = NULL; - mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); if (ctx->fake_req_limit >= atomic_read(&qp_ctx->qp->qp_status.used) && !list_empty(&qp_ctx->backlog)) { @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ static struct sec_req *sec_back_req_clear(struct sec_ctx *ctx, typeof(*backlog_req), backlog_head); list_del(&backlog_req->backlog_head); } - mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock); return backlog_req; } -- 2.17.1