On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:11 PM Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
>
> On VMGEXIT, sev_handle_vmgexit() creates a host mapping for the GHCB GPA,
> and unmaps it just before VM-entry. This long-lived GHCB map is used by
> the VMGEXIT handler through accessors such as ghcb_{set_get}_xxx().
>
> A long-lived GHCB map can cause issue when SEV-SNP is enabled. When
> SEV-SNP is enabled the mapped GPA needs to be protected against a page
> state change.
>
> To eliminate the long-lived GHCB mapping, update the GHCB sync operations
> to explicitly map the GHCB before access and unmap it after access is
> complete. This requires that the setting of the GHCBs sw_exit_info_{1,2}
> fields be done during sev_es_sync_to_ghcb(), so create two new fields in
> the vcpu_svm struct to hold these values when required to be set outside
> of the GHCB mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 12 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 24 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 01ea257e17d6..c70f3f7e06a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -2823,15 +2823,40 @@ void sev_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvfree(svm->sev_es.ghcb_sa);
> }
>
> +static inline int svm_map_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_host_map *map)
> +{
> + struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
> + u64 gfn = gpa_to_gfn(control->ghcb_gpa);
> +
> + if (kvm_vcpu_map(&svm->vcpu, gfn, map)) {
> + /* Unable to map GHCB from guest */
> + pr_err("error mapping GHCB GFN [%#llx] from guest\n", gfn);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
There is a perf cost to this suggestion but it might make accessing
the GHCB safer for KVM. Have you thought about just using
kvm_read_guest() or copy_from_user() to fully copy out the GCHB into a
KVM owned buffer, then copying it back before the VMRUN. That way the
KVM doesn't need to guard against page_state_changes on the GHCBs,
that could be a perf improvement in a follow up.
Since we cannot unmap GHCBs I don't think UPM will help here so we
probably want to make these patches safe against malicious guests
making GHCBs private. But maybe UPM does help?
