Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 5 May 2022 21:20:46 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> no one seems to care about this problem. :/
>>
>> Maybe too many components are involved, I'm the respective maintainers
>> on Cc.
>>
>> Cc += the CAAM maintainers
>> Cc += the io_uring maintainers
>> Cc += the kTLS maintainers
>>
>> On 27.04.2022 10:20:40, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have a Layerscape-1046a based board where I'm trying to use a
>> > combination of liburing (v2.0) with splice, kTLS and CAAM (kernel
>> > v5.17). The problem I see is that on shutdown the last bytes are
>> > missing. It looks like io_uring is not waiting for all completions
>> > from the CAAM driver.
>> >
>> > With ARM-ASM instead of the CAAM, the setup works fine.
>>
>> What's the difference between the CAAM and ARM-ASM crypto? Without
>> looking into the code I think the CAAM is asynchron while ARM-ASM is
>> synchron. Is this worth investigating?
>
> Sounds like
> 20ffc7adf53a ("net/tls: missing received data after fast remote close")
That fixes something in tls_sw. I have a kernel that includes this
patch. So this sounds right, but can't be it, right?
Best regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Dipl.-Inform. Steffen Trumtrar |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
