Re: [PATCH RFC v1] random: use static branch for crng_ready()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:40:52PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> +static bool crng_ready_slowpath(void)
>> +{
>> +     if (crng_init <= 1)
>> +             return false;
>> +     if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled() || cmpxchg(&crng_init, 2, 3) != 2)
>> +             return true;
> 
> Nobody chimed in here, but for posterity I thought I should point out
> that this approach actually won't work, since in_atomic() doesn't work
> with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n kernels.
> 
> So back to the drawing board in trying to figure out the best way to do
> this...

Well the standard solution to code paths that require sleeping is
to use a work queue.  So any reason why you can't just schedule
a work to do the static_branch_enable?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux