On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 11:26:16PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > In the event that random_get_entropy() can't access a cycle counter or > similar, falling back to returning 0 is really not the best we can do. > Instead, at least calling random_get_entropy_fallback() would be > preferable, because that always needs to return _something_, even > falling back to jiffies eventually. It's not as though > random_get_entropy_fallback() is super high precision or guaranteed to > be entropic, but basically anything that's not zero all the time is > better than returning zero all the time. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
