Hi Borislav, On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:59 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you > > or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say. > > Which would you like? > > We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you > might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a > new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is > appreciated. :) Okay, no problem. I'll make the change there and get_cycles() for v+1 of the patchset. Jason
