Hi Rob, On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:40 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Moving this check to get_cycles() implementation would eliminate the > RiscV implementation of random_get_entropy() if you follow my other > suggestion. Not an option. random_get_entropy() != get_cycles(). Sometimes these are different functions. Returning random_get_entropy_fallback() from get_cycles(), for example, wouldn't make any sense. Jason
