On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:56 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 03:53:02PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef a écrit :
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:45 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Le Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:14:16AM +0000, Robin Murphy a écrit :
> > > > On 2022-03-07 10:48, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > > > Le Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 09:59:29AM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef a �crit :
> > > > >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:49 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:30:06PM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Hello
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I got:
> > > > >>>> [ 17.563793] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > >>>> [ 17.568492] DMA-API: ccree e6601000.crypto: device driver frees DMA memory with different direction [device address=0x0000000078fe5800] [size=8 bytes] [mapped with DMA_TO_DEVICE] [unmapped with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The direction argument during unmap must match whatever direction
> > > > >>> you used during the original map call.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Yes, of course. I changed one but forgot the other.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Corentin, could you be kind and check that this solves the original
> > > > >> problem and does not produce new warnings?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c
> > > > >> b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c
> > > > >> index 11e0278c8631..31cfe014922e 100644
> > > > >> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c
> > > > >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c
> > > > >> @@ -356,12 +356,14 @@ void cc_unmap_cipher_request(struct device *dev,
> > > > >> void *ctx,
> > > > >> req_ctx->mlli_params.mlli_dma_addr);
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > > >> - dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src));
> > > > >> -
> > > > >> if (src != dst) {
> > > > >> - dma_unmap_sg(dev, dst, req_ctx->out_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, dst, req_ctx->out_nents, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > > > >> dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->dst=%pK\n", sg_virt(dst));
> > > > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src));
> > > > >> + } else {
> > > > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src));
> > > > >> }
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> @@ -377,6 +379,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata
> > > > >> *drvdata, void *ctx,
> > > > >> u32 dummy = 0;
> > > > >> int rc = 0;
> > > > >> u32 mapped_nents = 0;
> > > > >> + int src_direction = (src != dst ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > > >>
> > > > >> req_ctx->dma_buf_type = CC_DMA_BUF_DLLI;
> > > > >> mlli_params->curr_pool = NULL;
> > > > >> @@ -399,7 +402,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata
> > > > >> *drvdata, void *ctx,
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> /* Map the src SGL */
> > > > >> - rc = cc_map_sg(dev, src, nbytes, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, &req_ctx->in_nents,
> > > > >> + rc = cc_map_sg(dev, src, nbytes, src_direction, &req_ctx->in_nents,
> > > > >> LLI_MAX_NUM_OF_DATA_ENTRIES, &dummy, &mapped_nents);
> > > > >> if (rc)
> > > > >> goto cipher_exit;
> > > > >> @@ -416,7 +419,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata
> > > > >> *drvdata, void *ctx,
> > > > >> }
> > > > >> } else {
> > > > >> /* Map the dst sg */
> > > > >> - rc = cc_map_sg(dev, dst, nbytes, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > > > >> + rc = cc_map_sg(dev, dst, nbytes, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> > > > >> &req_ctx->out_nents, LLI_MAX_NUM_OF_DATA_ENTRIES,
> > > > >> &dummy, &mapped_nents);
> > > > >> if (rc)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello
> > > > >
> > > > > I still get the warning:
> > > > > [ 433.406230] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > [ 433.406326] DMA-API: ccree e6601000.crypto: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported
> > > > > [ 433.406386] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 31074 at /home/clabbe/linux-next/kernel/dma/debug.c:571 add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > > > > [ 433.406434] Modules linked in:
> > > > > [ 433.406458] CPU: 7 PID: 31074 Comm: kcapi Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220303-00130-g30042e47ee47-dirty #54
> > > > > [ 433.406473] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a77950 (DT)
> > > > > [ 433.406484] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > > > > [ 433.406498] pc : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > > > > [ 433.406510] lr : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > > > > [ 433.406522] sp : ffff800015da3690
> > > > > [ 433.406531] x29: ffff800015da3690 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
> > > > > [ 433.406562] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff80000b4c7bc0 x24: ffff80000b4c7000
> > > > > [ 433.406593] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000ffffffef x21: ffff80000a9b6000
> > > > > [ 433.406623] x20: ffff0004c0af5c00 x19: ffff80000b420000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > > > > [ 433.406653] x17: 6c7265766f202c54 x16: 534958454520676e x15: 000000000000022e
> > > > > [ 433.406683] x14: ffff800015da3380 x13: 00000000ffffffea x12: ffff80000b4be010
> > > > > [ 433.406713] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff80000b4a6028
> > > > > [ 433.406743] x8 : c0000000ffffefff x7 : 0000000000017fe8 x6 : ffff80000b4a5fd0
> > > > > [ 433.406773] x5 : ffff0006ff795c48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027
> > > > > [ 433.406802] x2 : 0000000000000023 x1 : 8ca4e4fbf4b87900 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > > > > [ 433.406833] Call trace:
> > > > > [ 433.406841] add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288
> > > > > [ 433.406854] debug_dma_map_sg+0x150/0x398
> > > > > [ 433.406869] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x9c/0x108
> > > > > [ 433.406889] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x28
> > > > > [ 433.406904] cc_map_sg+0x80/0x100
> > > > > [ 433.406924] cc_map_cipher_request+0x178/0x3c8
> > > > > [ 433.406939] cc_cipher_process+0x210/0xb58
> > > > > [ 433.406953] cc_cipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x38
> > > > > [ 433.406967] crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x44/0x78
> > > > > [ 433.406986] skcipher_recvmsg+0x36c/0x420
> > > > > [ 433.407003] ____sys_recvmsg+0x90/0x280
> > > > > [ 433.407024] ___sys_recvmsg+0x88/0xd0
> > > > > [ 433.407038] __sys_recvmsg+0x6c/0xd0
> > > > > [ 433.407049] __arm64_sys_recvmsg+0x24/0x30
> > > > > [ 433.407061] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100
> > > > > [ 433.407082] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x90/0x120
> > > > > [ 433.407096] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x88
> > > > > [ 433.407110] el0_svc+0x4c/0x100
> > > > > [ 433.407131] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8
> > > > > [ 433.407145] el0t_64_sync+0x170/0x174
> > > > > [ 433.407160] irq event stamp: 5624
> > > > > [ 433.407168] hardirqs last enabled at (5623): [<ffff80000812f6a8>] __up_console_sem+0x60/0x98
> > > > > [ 433.407191] hardirqs last disabled at (5624): [<ffff800009c9a060>] el1_dbg+0x28/0x90
> > > > > [ 433.407208] softirqs last enabled at (5570): [<ffff8000097e62f8>] lock_sock_nested+0x80/0xa0
> > > > > [ 433.407226] softirqs last disabled at (5568): [<ffff8000097e62d8>] lock_sock_nested+0x60/0xa0
> > > > > [ 433.407241] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > > [ 433.407381] DMA-API: Mapped at:
> > > > > [ 433.407396] debug_dma_map_sg+0x16c/0x398
> > > > > [ 433.407416] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x9c/0x108
> > > > > [ 433.407436] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x28
> > > > > [ 433.407455] cc_map_sg+0x80/0x100
> > > > > [ 433.407475] cc_map_cipher_request+0x178/0x3c8
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > BUT I start to thing this is a bug in DMA-API debug.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My sun8i-ss driver hit the same warning:
> > > > > [ 142.458351] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 90 at kernel/dma/debug.c:597 add_dma_entry+0x2ec/0x4cc
> > > > > [ 142.458429] DMA-API: sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported
> > > > > [ 142.458455] Modules linked in: ccm algif_aead xts cmac
> > > > > [ 142.458563] CPU: 1 PID: 90 Comm: 1c15000.crypto- Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220307-00132-g39dad568d20a-dirty #223
> > > > > [ 142.458581] Hardware name: Allwinner A83t board
> > > > > [ 142.458596] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
> > > > > [ 142.458627] show_stack from 0xf0abdd1c
> > > > > [ 142.458646] irq event stamp: 31747
> > > > > [ 142.458660] hardirqs last enabled at (31753): [<c019316c>] __up_console_sem+0x50/0x60
> > > > > [ 142.458688] hardirqs last disabled at (31758): [<c0193158>] __up_console_sem+0x3c/0x60
> > > > > [ 142.458710] softirqs last enabled at (31600): [<c06990c8>] sun8i_ss_handle_cipher_request+0x300/0x8b8
> > > > > [ 142.458738] softirqs last disabled at (31580): [<c06990c8>] sun8i_ss_handle_cipher_request+0x300/0x8b8
> > > > > [ 142.458758] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > > [ 142.458771] DMA-API: Mapped at:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes the mapped at is empty just after.
> > > > >
> > > > > And the sequence of DMA operations in my driver is simple, so I cannot see how any overlap could occur.
> > > >
> > > > The "overlap" is in the sense of having more than one mapping within the
> > > > same cacheline:
> > > >
> > > > [ 142.458120] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f200 N=ba79f
> > > > D=ba79f200 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0
> > > > [ 142.458156] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=445dc010 N=445dc
> > > > D=445dc010 L=10 DMA_TO_DEVICE attrs=0
> > > > [ 142.458178] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: SRC 0/1/1 445dc000 len=16 bi=0
> > > > [ 142.458215] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: DST 0/1/1 ba79f200 len=16 bi=0
> > > > [ 142.458234] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f210 N=ba79f
> > > > D=ba79f210 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0
> > > >
> > > > This actually illustrates exactly the reason why this is unsupportable.
> > > > ba79f200 is mapped for DMA_FROM_DEVICE, therefore subsequently mapping
> > > > ba79f210 for DMA_TO_DEVICE may cause the cacheline covering the range
> > > > ba79f200-ba79f23f to be written back over the top of data that the
> > > > device has already started to write to memory. Hello data corruption.
> > > >
> > > > Separate DMA mappings should be from separate memory allocations,
> > > > respecting ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I just saw something strange, only one SG is involved, and I dont see any DMA_TO_DEVICE for ba79f210.
> > > I see 2 DMA_FROM_DEVICE (ba79f200 and ba79f210), but only one should be done.
> > > Why 2 FROM mappings are added with only one sg ?
> > >
> >
> > The thing that does the memory allocation of user calls from libkcapi
> > tests is the crypto/af_alg.c code ...
> >
> > I assume the sglist has two buffers? could it be that somehow they are
> > not DMA aligned? that would be weird indeed...
> >
>
> The SGlist has only one SG, so only one buffer, it is why I dont understand the double call to add_dma_entry().
But... a scatter gather list by its nature can hold more than one
buffer, no? that is the whole purpose of a scatter gather list...?
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
values of β will give rise to dom!
