Dear Michal,
Thank you for the patch.
Am 11.01.22 um 12:37 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
Could you please remove the dot/period at the end of the git commit
message summary?
Copy the code from s390x
Both powerpc and s390x use appended signature format (as opposed to EFI
based patforms using PE format).
patforms → platforms
How can this be tested?
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
---
v3: - Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxx>: Update the comit message with
explanation why the s390 code is usable on powerpc.
- Include correct header for mod_check_sig
- Nayna <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Mention additional IMA features
in kconfig text
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index dea74d7717c0..1cde9b6c5987 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -560,6 +560,22 @@ config KEXEC_FILE
config ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
def_bool KEXEC_FILE
+config KEXEC_SIG
+ bool "Verify kernel signature during kexec_file_load() syscall"
+ depends on KEXEC_FILE && MODULE_SIG_FORMAT
+ help
+ This option makes kernel signature verification mandatory for
+ the kexec_file_load() syscall.
+
+ In addition to that option, you need to enable signature
+ verification for the corresponding kernel image type being
+ loaded in order for this to work.
+
+ Note: on powerpc IMA_ARCH_POLICY also implements kexec'ed kernel
+ verification. In addition IMA adds kernel hashes to the measurement
+ list, extends IMA PCR in the TPM, and implements kernel image
+ blacklist by hash.
So, what is the takeaway for the user? IMA_ARCH_POLICY is preferred?
What is the disadvantage, and two implementations(?) needed then? More
overhead?
+
config RELOCATABLE
bool "Build a relocatable kernel"
depends on PPC64 || (FLATMEM && (44x || FSL_BOOKE))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
index eeb258002d1e..98d1cb5135b4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/module_signature.h>
static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
unsigned long kernel_len, char *initrd,
@@ -151,7 +152,42 @@ static void *elf64_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : NULL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
+int elf64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
+{
+ const unsigned long marker_len = sizeof(MODULE_SIG_STRING) - 1;
+ struct module_signature *ms;
+ unsigned long sig_len;
Use size_t to match the signature of `verify_pkcs7_signature()`?
+ int ret;
+
+ if (marker_len > kernel_len)
+ return -EKEYREJECTED;
+
+ if (memcmp(kernel + kernel_len - marker_len, MODULE_SIG_STRING,
+ marker_len))
+ return -EKEYREJECTED;
+ kernel_len -= marker_len;
+
+ ms = (void *)kernel + kernel_len - sizeof(*ms);
+ ret = mod_check_sig(ms, kernel_len, "kexec");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ sig_len = be32_to_cpu(ms->sig_len);
+ kernel_len -= sizeof(*ms) + sig_len;
+
+ return verify_pkcs7_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
+ kernel + kernel_len, sig_len,
+ VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
+ VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE,
+ NULL, NULL);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG */
+
const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_elf64_ops = {
.probe = kexec_elf_probe,
.load = elf64_load,
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
+ .verify_sig = elf64_verify_sig,
+#endif
};
Kind regards,
Paul
