Because of the possible alloc failure of the alloc_page(), it could
return NULL pointer.
And there is a check below the sg_assign_page().
But it will be more logical to move the NULL check before the
sg_assign_page().
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changelog:
v1 -> v2
* Change 1. Move the previous check in front of sg_assign_page().
---
crypto/af_alg.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/af_alg.c b/crypto/af_alg.c
index 18cc82dc4a42..f79e446d8132 100644
--- a/crypto/af_alg.c
+++ b/crypto/af_alg.c
@@ -931,16 +931,19 @@ int af_alg_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
sg_unmark_end(sg + sgl->cur - 1);
do {
+ struct page *pg;
unsigned int i = sgl->cur;
plen = min_t(size_t, len, PAGE_SIZE);
- sg_assign_page(sg + i, alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL));
- if (!sg_page(sg + i)) {
+ pg = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pg) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto unlock;
}
+ sg_assign_page(sg + i, pg);
+
err = memcpy_from_msg(page_address(sg_page(sg + i)),
msg, plen);
if (err) {
--
2.25.1
