On Nov 29, 2021, at 23:23, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:36:15AM +0000, Bae, Chang Seok wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2021, at 19:27, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:06:45PM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote: >>>> >>>> == Non Use Cases == >>>> >>>> Bare metal disk encryption is the only use case intended by these patches. >>> >>> If that's the case, why are so many encryption modes being added (ECB, CTR, CBC, >>> and XTS)? Wouldn't just XTS be sufficient? >> >> Right, it would reduce the crypt library changes significantly. But it is >> clueless whether XTS is sufficient to support DM-crypt, because a user may >> select the kernel’s crypto API via ‘capi:', [1]. > > Just because dm-crypt allows you to create a ECB or CTR encrypted disk does not > mean that it is a good idea. Okay, it sounds like at least ECB and CTR supports are not practically needed. I have no problem trimming down to exclude them. Thanks, Chang