Re: [PATCH 0/8] memset() in crypto code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I see no point in doing 8 separate patches that all have the same
> subject and the exact same light description.
>
> I think it would be better to have a single patch with all the changes,
> and use the cover letter description as description for that patch.

It seemed better to me to have separate patches because there
are 8 files involved, possibly each with a different maintainer.

Likely I should have gone further & included the filenames in
the subject: lines & maintainer addresses in cc:



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux