Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.16-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:44 AM, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 11/15/21 17:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
>>> v5.16-rc1[1] compared to v5.15[2].
>>> 
>>> Summarized:
>>>  - build errors: +20/-13
>>>  - build warnings: +3/-28
>>> 
>>> Happy fixing! ;-)
>>> 
>>> Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service.
>>> 
>>> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf/  (all 90 configs)
>>> [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/8bb7eca972ad531c9b149c0a51ab43a417385813/  (all 90 configs)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *** ERRORS ***
>>> 
>>> 20 error regressions:
>>>  + /kisskb/src/arch/parisc/include/asm/jump_label.h: error: expected ':' before '__stringify':  => 33:4, 18:4
>>>  + /kisskb/src/arch/parisc/include/asm/jump_label.h: error: label 'l_yes' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]:  => 38:1, 23:1
>> 
>>    due to static_branch_likely() in crypto/api.c
>> 
>> parisc-allmodconfig
> 
> fixed now in the parisc for-next git tree.
> 
> 
>>>  + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h: error: "COND" redefined [-Werror]:  => 531
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3252 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 47:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3360 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 499:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 5344 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 334:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 5380 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 354:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 1824 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 372:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 2224 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 204:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3800 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 476:1
>> 
>> parisc-allmodconfig
> 
> parisc needs much bigger frame sizes, so I'm not astonished here.
> During the v5.15 cycl I increased it to 1536 (from 1280), so I'm simply tempted to
> increase it this time to 4096, unless someone has a better idea....

This patch set should fix the zstd stack size warnings [0]. I’ve
verified the fix using the same tooling: gcc-8-hppa-linux-gnu.

I’ll send the PR to Linus tomorrow. I’ve been informed that it
isn't strictly necessary to send the patches to the mailing list
for bug fixes, but its already done, so I’ll wait and see if there
is any feedback.

Best,
Nick Terrell

[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/16/1217

>>>  + /kisskb/src/fs/ntfs/aops.c: error: the frame size of 2240 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 1311:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/fs/ntfs/aops.c: error: the frame size of 2304 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 1311:1
>>>  + /kisskb/src/fs/ntfs/aops.c: error: the frame size of 2320 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]:  => 1311:1
>> 
>> powerpc-allmodconfig
>> 
>>>  + /kisskb/src/include/linux/compiler_types.h: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_366' declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field:  => 335:38
>> 
>>    in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c
>> 
>> arm64-allmodconfig (gcc8)
>> 
>>>  + /kisskb/src/include/linux/fortify-string.h: error: call to '__read_overflow' declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object (1st parameter):  => 263:25, 277:17
>> 
>>    in lib/test_kasan.c
>> 
>> s390-all{mod,yes}config
>> arm64-allmodconfig (gcc11)
>> 
>>>  + error: modpost: "mips_cm_is64" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!:  => N/A
>>>  + error: modpost: "mips_cm_lock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!:  => N/A
>>>  + error: modpost: "mips_cm_unlock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!:  => N/A
>>>  + error: modpost: "mips_cpc_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!:  => N/A
>>>  + error: modpost: "mips_gcr_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!:  => N/A
>> 
>> mips-allmodconfig
>> 
>>> 3 warning regressions:
>>>  + <stdin>: warning: #warning syscall futex_waitv not implemented [-Wcpp]:  => 1559:2
>> 
>> powerpc, m68k, mips, s390, parisc (and probably more)
> 
> Will someone update all of them at once?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Helge
> 
> 
>>>  + arch/m68k/configs/multi_defconfig: warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for MCTP:  => 322
>>>  + arch/m68k/configs/sun3_defconfig: warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for MCTP:  => 295
>> 
>> Yeah, that happens when symbols are changed from tristate to bool...
>> Will be fixed in 5.17-rc1, with the next defconfig refresh.
>> 
>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>> 
>>                        Geert
>> 
>> --
>> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
>> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>>                                -- Linus Torvalds
>> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux