Re: [PATCH v5 13/22] dma: qcom: bam_dma: Add support to initialize interconnect path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bhupesh,

On 11/10/21 12:59 PM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
From: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxxx>

BAM dma engine associated with certain hardware blocks could require
relevant interconnect pieces be initialized prior to the dma engine
initialization. For e.g. crypto bam dma engine on sm8250. Such requirement
is passed on to the bam dma driver from dt via the "interconnects"
property.  Add support in bam_dma driver to check whether the interconnect
path is accessible/enabled prior to attempting driver intializations.

Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Make header file inclusion alphabetical and use 'devm_of_icc_get()']
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxxx>

please let me ask you to swap your and Thara's sob tags above, there is
a rule applicable to all cases dealing with someone's else changes:

From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

  Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from
  people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its
  development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took
  as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with
  the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux