On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html, > SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for > other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3. > > Suggested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code change you're doing. /Jarkko
