On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:57 PM Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:25 AM Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Le Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:27:12PM +0800, Dongliang Mu a écrit : > > > In sun8i_ce_hash_run, all the dma_mmap_sg/single will cause memory leak > > > due to no corresponding unmap operation if errors happen. > > > > > > Fix this by adding error handling part for all the dma_mmap_sg/single. > > > > > > > I think it could be better worded, error handling is already there (but bad). > > Sure. How about "Fix this by freeing the objects allocated by > dma_mmap_sg/single when errors occur."? > > > > > > Fixes: 56f6d5aee88d ("crypto: sun8i-ce - support hash algorithms") > > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c | 28 +++++++++---------- > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c > > > index 88194718a806..d454ad99deee 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c > > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c > > > @@ -286,16 +286,14 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > > > > /* the padding could be up to two block. */ > > > buf = kzalloc(bs * 2, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); > > > - if (!buf) { > > > - err = -ENOMEM; > > > - goto theend; > > > > Please keep all goto error for being consistent. > > OK, no problem. > > BTW, usually for the 1st malloc failure, I prefer returning with errno directly. For this case, as crypto_finalize_hash_request must be executed, so directly return is incorrect. I will add a goto label before crypto_finalize_hash_request. > > > > > > - } > > > + if (!buf) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > bf = (__le32 *)buf; > > > > > > result = kzalloc(digestsize, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); > > > if (!result) { > > > - err = -ENOMEM; > > > - goto theend; > > > + kfree(buf); > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > } > > > > > > flow = rctx->flow; > > > @@ -321,7 +319,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > if (nr_sgs <= 0 || nr_sgs > MAX_SG) { > > > dev_err(ce->dev, "Invalid sg number %d\n", nr_sgs); > > > err = -EINVAL; > > > - goto theend; > > > + goto err_result; > > > } > > > > > > len = areq->nbytes; > > > @@ -334,7 +332,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > if (len > 0) { > > > dev_err(ce->dev, "remaining len %d\n", len); > > > err = -EINVAL; > > > - goto theend; > > > + goto err_unmap_sg; > > > } > > > addr_res = dma_map_single(ce->dev, result, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > > cet->t_dst[0].addr = cpu_to_le32(addr_res); > > > @@ -342,7 +340,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > if (dma_mapping_error(ce->dev, addr_res)) { > > > dev_err(ce->dev, "DMA map dest\n"); > > > err = -EINVAL; > > > - goto theend; > > > + goto err_unmap_sg; > > > } > > > > > > byte_count = areq->nbytes; > > > @@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > if (dma_mapping_error(ce->dev, addr_pad)) { > > > dev_err(ce->dev, "DMA error on padding SG\n"); > > > err = -EINVAL; > > > - goto theend; > > > + goto err_addr_res; > > > } > > > > > > if (ce->variant->hash_t_dlen_in_bits) > > > @@ -405,15 +403,15 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq) > > > err = sun8i_ce_run_task(ce, flow, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm)); > > > > > > dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_pad, j * 4, DMA_TO_DEVICE); > > > +err_addr_res: > > > + dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_res, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > > +err_unmap_sg: > > > dma_unmap_sg(ce->dev, areq->src, sg_nents(areq->src), > > > DMA_TO_DEVICE); > > > - dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_res, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > > - > > > - > > > memcpy(areq->result, result, algt->alg.hash.halg.digestsize); > > > > The result should be copied only when everything is ok. Please add a "if (!err)" > > Sure. > > > > > Thanks for your work > > Regards