Implement NVMe-oF In-Band authentication. This patch adds two new fabric options 'dhchap_key' to specify the PSKpre-shared-key. Also, we need a sysfs knob to rotate the key that will trigger re-authentication or even a simple controller(s-plural) reset, so this should go beyond just the connection string.Yeah, re-authentication currently is not implemented. I first wanted to get this patchset out such that we can settle on the userspace interface (both from host and target).
I think this is mandatory from the start (at the very least from the host side) because credentials get rotated. The flow imo needs to be that the target allows to update the credentials even when the subsystem is exposed and connected, but keep all existing hosts connected such that only new connections will need the new credentials. (an incremental step, which would be optional is to allow it for a configurable grace period and then disconnect existing hosts, which would force new connections with updated credentials). From the host side, we need to expose a controller (or more appropriately a subsystem) sysfs file to override the existing key. That can initially just trigger a controller reset, and incrementally can do a graceful re-authentication).
I'll have to think on how we should handle authentication; one of the really interesting cases would be when one malicious admin will _just_ send a 'negotiate' command to the controller. As per spec the controller will be waiting for an 'authentication receive' command to send a 'challenge' payload back to the host. But that will never come, so as it stands currently the controller is required to abort the connection.Not very nice.
Well, at the moment we can keep it open and discuss this in the TWG.
Oh, sure. It's already sitting around in my local repo (surprise, surprise); will be ending it out next time.P.S. can you add also the nvme-cli code in the next go?
Great, thanks.
and 'dhchap_authenticate'to request bi-directional authentication of both the host and the controller.bidirectional? not uni-directional?Yeah, that's a bit of a misnomer. When a PSK is specified, the controller will start the authentication protocol such that the _controller_ can validate the host. If the host wants to authenticate the controller is needs to set this flag.Hence bi-directional authentication. But I'm the first to admit that this is poor wording for the flag.
It is misleading. But I'll need to go look again because I didn't see the host authenticating the controller..
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig | 11 + drivers/nvme/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/nvme/host/auth.c | 813 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/nvme/host/auth.h | 23 + drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 77 +++- drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c | 65 ++- drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h | 8 + drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 15 + drivers/nvme/host/trace.c | 32 ++ 9 files changed, 1041 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/nvme/host/auth.c create mode 100644 drivers/nvme/host/auth.h diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig index c3f3d77f1aac..853c546305e9 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig @@ -85,3 +85,14 @@ config NVME_TCP from https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli. If unsure, say N. + +config NVME_AUTH + bool "NVM Express over Fabrics In-Band Authentication" + depends on NVME_TCP + select CRYPTO_SHA256 + select CRYPTO_SHA512 + help+ This provides support for NVMe over Fabrics In-Band Authentication+ for the NVMe over TCP transport.In this form, nothing is specific to nvme-tcp here afaict.Indeed. I guess we can leave out the nvme-tcp reference here.+ + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/Makefile b/drivers/nvme/host/Makefile index cbc509784b2e..03748a55a12b 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/Makefile +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/Makefile @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ nvme-core-$(CONFIG_NVME_HWMON) += hwmon.o nvme-y += pci.o nvme-fabrics-y += fabrics.o +nvme-fabrics-$(CONFIG_NVME_AUTH) += auth.o nvme-rdma-y += rdma.o diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..448a3adebea6 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c @@ -0,0 +1,813 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (c) 2020 Hannes Reinecke, SUSE Linux + */ + +#include <linux/crc32.h> +#include <linux/base64.h> +#include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <crypto/hash.h> +#include <crypto/kpp.h> +#include "nvme.h" +#include "fabrics.h" +#include "auth.h" + +static u32 nvme_dhchap_seqnum; + +struct nvme_dhchap_context {Maybe nvme_dhchap_queue_context ? I'm thinking that we should perhaps split it to host-wide, subsys-wide and queue specific auth contexts? Let's see...Interestingly enough, that's what I did for the target side.For the host side I found it easier that way, as then we'll have a single authentication context which can be deleted after authentication finished, and be sure that we removed _all_ information.Security and all that.Splitting it off would require to remove information on three different places, and observing life-time rules for them.So more of a chance to mess things up :-)
I understand what you are saying, but this way it will be challanging to cross check stuff. It is also where things sort of belong...
+ struct crypto_shash *shash_tfm; + unsigned char *key; + size_t key_len; + int qid; + u32 s1; + u32 s2; + u16 transaction; + u8 status; + u8 hash_id; + u8 hash_len; + u8 c1[64]; + u8 c2[64]; + u8 response[64]; + u8 *ctrl_key; + int ctrl_key_len; + u8 *host_key; + int host_key_len; + u8 *sess_key; + int sess_key_len; +}; + +struct nvmet_dhchap_hash_map {nvmet?Yeah; originally I coded that for the target side, and only later moved it into the host side to have it usable for both.Will be fixing it up.+ int id; + int hash_len; + const char hmac[15]; + const char digest[15]; +} hash_map[] = { + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA256, + .hash_len = 32, + .hmac = "hmac(sha256)", .digest = "sha256" }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA384, + .hash_len = 48, + .hmac = "hmac(sha384)", .digest = "sha384" }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA512, + .hash_len = 64, + .hmac = "hmac(sha512)", .digest = "sha512" }, +}; + +const char *nvme_auth_hmac_name(int hmac_id)Should these arrays be static?Definitely.+{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_map); i++) { + if (hash_map[i].id == hmac_id) + return hash_map[i].hmac; + } + return NULL; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_auth_hmac_name); + +const char *nvme_auth_digest_name(int hmac_id) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_map); i++) { + if (hash_map[i].id == hmac_id) + return hash_map[i].digest; + } + return NULL; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_auth_digest_name); + +int nvme_auth_hmac_len(int hmac_id) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_map); i++) { + if (hash_map[i].id == hmac_id) + return hash_map[i].hash_len; + } + return -1; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_auth_hmac_len); + +int nvme_auth_hmac_id(const char *hmac_name) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_map); i++) { + if (!strncmp(hash_map[i].hmac, hmac_name, + strlen(hash_map[i].hmac))) + return hash_map[i].id; + } + return -1; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_auth_hmac_id); + +unsigned char *nvme_auth_extract_secret(unsigned char *dhchap_secret, + size_t *dhchap_key_len) +{ + unsigned char *dhchap_key; + u32 crc; + int key_len; + size_t allocated_len; + + allocated_len = strlen(dhchap_secret) - 10;the 10 feels like a magic here, should at least note this is the "DHHC-1:..." prefix.It _is_ magic. And it might even be better to just pass in the string _without_ the DHHC-1: prefix.
I don't think that the user should pass in a key in that form at all, its none of its concern the compliant NVMe representation is.
+ dhchap_key = kzalloc(allocated_len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dhchap_key) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + key_len = base64_decode(dhchap_secret + 10, + allocated_len, dhchap_key); + if (key_len != 36 && key_len != 52 && + key_len != 68) { + pr_debug("Invalid DH-HMAC-CHAP key len %d\n", + key_len); + kfree(dhchap_key); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + pr_debug("DH-HMAC-CHAP Key: %*ph\n", + (int)key_len, dhchap_key);One can argue if even printing this is problematic..Debugging scaffolding. You wouldn't believe how many things can go wrong... And yes, that should be removed.
Cool.
+ + /* The last four bytes is the CRC in little-endian format */ + key_len -= 4; + /* + * The linux implementation doesn't do pre- and post-increments, + * so we have to do it manually. + */ + crc = ~crc32(~0, dhchap_key, key_len); + + if (get_unaligned_le32(dhchap_key + key_len) != crc) { + pr_debug("DH-HMAC-CHAP crc mismatch (key %08x, crc %08x)\n", + get_unaligned_le32(dhchap_key + key_len), crc); + kfree(dhchap_key); + return ERR_PTR(-EKEYREJECTED); + } + *dhchap_key_len = key_len; + return dhchap_key; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_auth_extract_secret); + +static int nvme_auth_send(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, int qid, + void *data, size_t tl) +{ + struct nvme_command cmd = {}; + blk_mq_req_flags_t flags = qid == NVME_QID_ANY ? + 0 : BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT | BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED; + struct request_queue *q = qid == NVME_QID_ANY ? + ctrl->fabrics_q : ctrl->connect_q; + int ret; + + cmd.auth_send.opcode = nvme_fabrics_command; + cmd.auth_send.fctype = nvme_fabrics_type_auth_send; + cmd.auth_send.secp = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_PROTOCOL_IDENTIFIER; + cmd.auth_send.spsp0 = 0x01; + cmd.auth_send.spsp1 = 0x01; + cmd.auth_send.tl = tl; + + ret = __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(q, &cmd, NULL, data, tl, 0, qid, + 0, flags); + if (ret) + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, + "%s: qid %d error %d\n", __func__, qid, ret);Maybe a little more informative print rather than __func__ ?Yes, can do.+ return ret; +} + +static int nvme_auth_receive(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, int qid, + void *buf, size_t al, + u16 transaction, u8 expected_msg ) +{ + struct nvme_command cmd = {}; + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_failure_data *data = buf; + blk_mq_req_flags_t flags = qid == NVME_QID_ANY ? + 0 : BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT | BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED; + struct request_queue *q = qid == NVME_QID_ANY ? + ctrl->fabrics_q : ctrl->connect_q; + int ret; + + cmd.auth_receive.opcode = nvme_fabrics_command; + cmd.auth_receive.fctype = nvme_fabrics_type_auth_receive; + cmd.auth_receive.secp = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_PROTOCOL_IDENTIFIER; + cmd.auth_receive.spsp0 = 0x01; + cmd.auth_receive.spsp1 = 0x01; + cmd.auth_receive.al = al; + + ret = __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(q, &cmd, NULL, buf, al, 0, qid, + 0, flags); + if (ret > 0) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d nvme status %x\n", + __func__, qid, ret); + ret = -EIO; + } + if (ret < 0) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d error %d\n", + __func__, qid, ret); + return ret; + } + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d auth_type %d auth_id %x\n", + __func__, qid, data->auth_type, data->auth_id); + if (data->auth_type == NVME_AUTH_COMMON_MESSAGES && + data->auth_id == NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_FAILURE1) { + return data->reason_code_explanation; + } + if (data->auth_type != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGES || + data->auth_id != expected_msg) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d invalid message %02x/%02x\n", + qid, data->auth_type, data->auth_id); + return NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INVALID_PAYLOAD; + } + if (le16_to_cpu(data->t_id) != transaction) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d invalid transaction ID %d\n", + qid, le16_to_cpu(data->t_id)); + return NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INVALID_PAYLOAD; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_negotiate(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)Maybe nvme_auth_set_dhchap_negotiate_data ?These are the individual steps in the state machine later on, so I wanted to keep the names identical.But I'm open to suggestions.Hmm. I do a check for the overall size at the start, so I'm not sure what this will buy us. And actually, anyone wanting to make sense of the implementation would need to look at the spec anyway.+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_negotiate_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data) + sizeof(union nvmf_auth_protocol); + + if (buf_size < size) + return -EINVAL; + + memset((u8 *)buf, 0, size); + data->auth_type = NVME_AUTH_COMMON_MESSAGES; + data->auth_id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_NEGOTIATE; + data->t_id = cpu_to_le16(chap->transaction); + data->sc_c = 0; /* No secure channel concatenation */ + data->napd = 1; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.authid = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_AUTH_ID; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.halen = 3; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.dhlen = 1;+ data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[0] = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA256; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[1] = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA384; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[2] = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA512; + data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[3] = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_NULL;You should comment that this routine expects buf to have enough room for both negotiate and auth_proto structures.
Unrelated to the spec, just makes the code more readable. There is an assumption on the buffer size passed, so it would be nice to document it in the code (so it is less likely to break in the future in the presence of assumptions).
+ + return size; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_challenge(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)Maybe nvme_auth_process_dhchap_challange ?See above. I'd rather have consistent names for the state machine. But I can change them to 'nvme_process_chchap_<statename>'+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_challenge_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data) + data->hl + data->dhvlen; + const char *gid_name; + + if (buf_size < size) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INVALID_PAYLOAD; + return -ENOMSG; + } + + if (data->hashid != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA256 && + data->hashid != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA384 && + data->hashid != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA512) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: invalid HASH ID %d\n", + chap->qid, data->hashid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_HASH_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + } + switch (data->dhgid) { + case NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_NULL: + gid_name = "null"; + break; + default: + gid_name = NULL; + break; + } + if (!gid_name) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: invalid DH group id %d\n", + chap->qid, data->dhgid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_DHGROUP_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + }Maybe some spaces between condition blocks?Ok.+ if (data->dhgid != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_NULL) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_DHGROUP_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + }+ if (data->dhgid == NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_NULL && data->dhvlen != 0) {+ dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: invalid DH value for NULL DH\n", + chap->qid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_DHGROUP_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + } + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d requested hash id %d\n", + __func__, chap->qid, data->hashid); + if (nvme_auth_hmac_len(data->hashid) != data->hl) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: invalid hash length\n", + chap->qid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_HASH_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + } + chap->hash_id = data->hashid; + chap->hash_len = data->hl; + chap->s1 = le32_to_cpu(data->seqnum); + memcpy(chap->c1, data->cval, chap->hash_len); + + return 0; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_reply(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)nvme_auth_set_dhchap_replyAh. Now I see what you're getting at. Okay, will be changing it.+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_reply_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data); + + size += 2 * chap->hash_len; + if (ctrl->opts->dhchap_auth) {The ctrl opts is not clear to me. what is dhchap_auth mean?As stated above, this is for bi-directional authentication. And yes, it is poor wording. 'dhchap_bidirectional' ?
dhchap_auth_ctrl maybe.
Also shouldn't these params be lifted to the subsys?I kinda like to have it all encapsulated in a common per-queue structure; on the host side this one isn't even attached to anything, so any new authentication attempt will allocate a new one, with no chance of accidentally re-using existing values.I thought this to be a rather nice property for a state-machine.
I understand, but different controllers for a single subsystem should not behave differently. Meaning for one you authenticate and the other you don't (or with different keys).
+ get_random_bytes(chap->c2, chap->hash_len); + chap->s2 = nvme_dhchap_seqnum++; + } else + memset(chap->c2, 0, chap->hash_len); + + if (chap->host_key_len) + size += chap->host_key_len; + + if (buf_size < size) + return -EINVAL; + + memset(buf, 0, size); + data->auth_type = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGES; + data->auth_id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_REPLY; + data->t_id = cpu_to_le16(chap->transaction); + data->hl = chap->hash_len; + data->dhvlen = chap->host_key_len; + data->seqnum = cpu_to_le32(chap->s2); + memcpy(data->rval, chap->response, chap->hash_len); + if (ctrl->opts->dhchap_auth) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d ctrl challenge %*ph\n", + __func__, chap->qid, + chap->hash_len, chap->c2); + data->cvalid = 1; + memcpy(data->rval + chap->hash_len, chap->c2, + chap->hash_len); + } + if (chap->host_key_len) + memcpy(data->rval + 2 * chap->hash_len, chap->host_key, + chap->host_key_len); + + return size; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_success1(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)nvme_auth_process_dhchap_success1OK.+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_success1_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data); + + if (ctrl->opts->dhchap_auth) + size += chap->hash_len; + + + if (buf_size < size) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INVALID_PAYLOAD; + return -ENOMSG; + } + + if (data->hl != chap->hash_len) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: invalid hash length %d\n", + chap->qid, data->hl); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_HASH_UNUSABLE; + return -EPROTO; + } + + if (!data->rvalid) + return 0; + + /* Validate controller response */ + if (memcmp(chap->response, data->rval, data->hl)) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d ctrl response %*ph\n", + __func__, chap->qid, chap->hash_len, data->rval); + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d host response %*ph\n", + __func__, chap->qid, chap->hash_len, chap->response); + dev_warn(ctrl->device,+ "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: controller authentication failed\n",+ chap->qid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INVALID_PAYLOAD; + return -EPROTO; + } + dev_info(ctrl->device, + "qid %d: DH-HMAC-CHAP: controller authenticated\n", + chap->qid); + return 0; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_success2(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)same+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_success2_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data); + + memset(buf, 0, size); + data->auth_type = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGES; + data->auth_id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_SUCCESS2; + data->t_id = cpu_to_le16(chap->transaction); + + return size; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_failure2(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap, + void *buf, size_t buf_size)same+{ + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_failure_data *data = buf; + size_t size = sizeof(*data); + + memset(buf, 0, size); + data->auth_type = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGES; + data->auth_id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_FAILURE2; + data->t_id = cpu_to_le16(chap->transaction); + data->reason_code = 1; + data->reason_code_explanation = chap->status; + + return size; +} + +int nvme_auth_select_hash(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap)Maybe _select_hf (hash function)? not a must, just sticks to the spec language.Hmm. Will be checking.+{ + char *hash_name; + int ret; + + switch (chap->hash_id) { + case NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA256: + hash_name = "hmac(sha256)"; + break; + case NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA384: + hash_name = "hmac(sha384)"; + break; + case NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA512: + hash_name = "hmac(sha512)"; + break; + default: + hash_name = NULL; + break; + } + if (!hash_name) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_NOT_USABLE; + return -EPROTO; + } + chap->shash_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hash_name, 0, + CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY); + if (IS_ERR(chap->shash_tfm)) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_NOT_USABLE; + chap->shash_tfm = NULL; + return -EPROTO; + } + if (!chap->key) { + dev_warn(ctrl->device, "qid %d: cannot select hash, no key\n", + chap->qid); + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_NOT_USABLE; + crypto_free_shash(chap->shash_tfm);Wouldn't it better to check this before allocating the tfm?Indeed. Will be changing it.+ chap->shash_tfm = NULL; + return -EINVAL; + }+ ret = crypto_shash_setkey(chap->shash_tfm, chap->key, chap->key_len);+ if (ret) { + chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_NOT_USABLE; + crypto_free_shash(chap->shash_tfm); + chap->shash_tfm = NULL; + return ret; + } + dev_info(ctrl->device, "qid %d: DH-HMAC_CHAP: selected hash %s\n", + chap->qid, hash_name); + return 0; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_host_response(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap) +{ + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, chap->shash_tfm); + u8 buf[4], *challenge = chap->c1; + int ret; ++ dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d host response seq %d transaction %d\n",+ __func__, chap->qid, chap->s1, chap->transaction); + shash->tfm = chap->shash_tfm; + ret = crypto_shash_init(shash); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, challenge, chap->hash_len); + if (ret) + goto out; + put_unaligned_le32(chap->s1, buf); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 4); + if (ret) + goto out; + put_unaligned_le16(chap->transaction, buf); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 2); + if (ret) + goto out; + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, "HostHost", 8);HostHost ? Can you refer me to the specific section that talks about this?NVMe 2.0 section DH-HMAC-CHAP_Reply Message, paragraph Response Value. HostHost.Would be good to have a comment on the format fed to the shash.Yes, will be doing so.+ if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->opts->host->nqn, + strlen(ctrl->opts->host->nqn)); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->opts->subsysnqn, + strlen(ctrl->opts->subsysnqn)); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_final(shash, chap->response); +out: + return ret; +} + +static int nvme_auth_dhchap_ctrl_response(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap) +{ + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, chap->shash_tfm); + u8 buf[4], *challenge = chap->c2; + int ret; ++ dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d host response seq %d transaction %d\n",+ __func__, chap->qid, chap->s2, chap->transaction); + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d challenge %*ph\n", + __func__, chap->qid, chap->hash_len, challenge); + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d subsysnqn %s\n", + __func__, chap->qid, ctrl->opts->subsysnqn); + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d hostnqn %s\n", + __func__, chap->qid, ctrl->opts->host->nqn); + shash->tfm = chap->shash_tfm; + ret = crypto_shash_init(shash); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, challenge, chap->hash_len); + if (ret) + goto out; + put_unaligned_le32(chap->s2, buf); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 4); + if (ret) + goto out; + put_unaligned_le16(chap->transaction, buf); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 2); + if (ret) + goto out; + memset(buf, 0, 4); + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, "Controller", 10); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->opts->subsysnqn, + strlen(ctrl->opts->subsysnqn)); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->opts->host->nqn, + strlen(ctrl->opts->host->nqn)); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = crypto_shash_final(shash, chap->response); +out: + return ret; +} + +int nvme_auth_generate_key(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap) +{ + int ret; + u8 key_hash; + const char *hmac_name; + struct crypto_shash *key_tfm; + + if (sscanf(ctrl->opts->dhchap_secret, "DHHC-1:%hhd:%*s:", + &key_hash) != 1) + return -EINVAL;I'd expect that the user will pass in a secret key (as binary) the the driver will build the spec compliant formatted string no? > Am I not reading this correctly?I'm under the impression that this is the format into which the User/Admin will get hold of the secret key.Spec says: '... all NVMe over Fabrics entities shall support the following ASCII representation of secrets ...'And as the userspace interface is the only way how the user/admin _could_ interact with the NVMe over Fabrics entities in Linux I guess we'll need to be able to parse it.
Right... But who is responsible for crcing and encoding it? nvme-cli?
We sure could allow a binary secret, too, but then what would be the point in converting it into the secret representation? The protocol revolves around the binary secret, not the transport representation.
I am not sure I understand who is responsible for represnting the key this way in Linux?
+ + chap->key = nvme_auth_extract_secret(ctrl->opts->dhchap_secret, + &chap->key_len); + if (IS_ERR(chap->key)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(chap->key); + chap->key = NULL; + return ret; + } + + if (key_hash == 0) + return 0; + + hmac_name = nvme_auth_hmac_name(key_hash); + if (!hmac_name) { + pr_debug("Invalid key hash id %d\n", key_hash); + return -EKEYREJECTED; + }Why does the user influence the hmac used? isn't that is driven by the susbsystem? I don't think that the user should choose in this level.That is another weirdness of the spec.The _secret_ will be hashed with a specific function, and that function is stated in the transport representation.(Cf section "DH-HMAC-CHAP Security Requirements").This is _not_ the hash function used by the authentication itself, which will be selected by the protocol.
Yes, I see it now, and it is indeed confusing.
So it's not the user here, but rather the transport specification of the key which selects the hash algorithm.
What do you mean by the transport specification?
+ + key_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hmac_name, 0, 0); + if (IS_ERR(key_tfm)) { + kfree(chap->key); + chap->key = NULL; + ret = PTR_ERR(key_tfm);You set ret and later return 0? I think that the success path in the else clause is hard to read and error prone...Do I? Will need to fix it up.+ } else { + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, key_tfm); + + shash->tfm = key_tfm; + ret = crypto_shash_setkey(key_tfm, chap->key, + chap->key_len); + if (ret < 0) { + crypto_free_shash(key_tfm); + kfree(chap->key); + chap->key = NULL; + return ret; + } + crypto_shash_init(shash); + crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->opts->host->nqn, + strlen(ctrl->opts->host->nqn)); + crypto_shash_update(shash, "NVMe-over-Fabrics", 17); + crypto_shash_final(shash, chap->key); + crypto_free_shash(key_tfm);Shouldn't these be done when preparing the dh-hmac-chap reply?By setting the hash here I avoid having to pass the required hash function for the secret transformation. I could be doing the entire secret transformation thingie when preparing the reply; reason why I did it here is that _having_ a secret is the precondition to everything else, so I wanted to check upfront for that.But I'll check what would happen if I move it.
Now that I understand that this is not the authentication transformation its ok I guess. Please add a comment in the code so its clearer.
+ } + return 0; +} + +void nvme_auth_free(struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap) +{ + if (chap->shash_tfm) + crypto_free_shash(chap->shash_tfm); + if (chap->key) + kfree(chap->key); + if (chap->ctrl_key) + kfree(chap->ctrl_key); + if (chap->host_key) + kfree(chap->host_key); + if (chap->sess_key) + kfree(chap->sess_key);No need to check null for kfree...Will be fixing it up.+ kfree(chap); +} + +int nvme_auth_negotiate(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, int qid) +{ + struct nvme_dhchap_context *chap; + void *buf; + size_t buf_size, tl; + int ret = 0; + + chap = kzalloc(sizeof(*chap), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!chap) + return -ENOMEM; + chap->qid = qid; + chap->transaction = ctrl->transaction++; + + ret = nvme_auth_generate_key(ctrl, chap); + if (ret) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: failed to generate key, error %d\n", + __func__, ret); + nvme_auth_free(chap); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Allocate a large enough buffer for the entire negotiation: + * 4k should be enough to ffdhe8192. + */ + buf_size = 4096; + buf = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!buf) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + + /* DH-HMAC-CHAP Step 1: send negotiate */I'd consider breaking these into sub-routines.Which ones? The preparation step?
I'm thinking:
1. nvme_auth_initiate_negotiation
- nvme_auth_set_dhchap_negotiate_data
- nvme_auth_send
2. nvme_auth_do_challange
- nvme_auth_receive
- nvme_auth_process_dhchap_challange
- nvme_auth_select_hash
- nvme_auth_dhchap_host_response
- nvme_auth_set_dhchap_reply
- nvme_auth_send
- nvme_auth_receive
- nvme_auth_process_dhchap_success1
3. if (ctrl->opts->dhchap_auth_ctrl)
- nvme_auth_dhchap_authenticate_ctrl
(e.g. nvme_auth_dhchap_ctrl_response)
4. nvme_auth_acknowledge_transaction
- nvme_auth_set_dhchap_success2
- nvme_auth_send
if steps 1,2,3 failed, goto target will have a func:
5. nvme_auth_fail_transaction
- nvme_auth_set_dhchap_failure2
- nvme_auth_send
Sure, can do.+ dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP negotiate\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_negotiate(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + tl = ret; + ret = nvme_auth_send(ctrl, qid, buf, tl); + if (ret) + goto out; + + memset(buf, 0, buf_size);+ ret = nvme_auth_receive(ctrl, qid, buf, buf_size, chap->transaction,+ NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_CHALLENGE); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, + "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP failed to receive challenge\n", + __func__, qid); + goto out; + } + if (ret > 0) { + chap->status = ret; + goto fail1; + } + + /* DH-HMAC-CHAP Step 2: receive challenge */ + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP challenge\n", + __func__, qid); + + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_challenge(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + if (ret) { + /* Invalid parameters for negotiate */ + goto fail2; + } + + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP select hash\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_select_hash(ctrl, chap); + if (ret) + goto fail2; + + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP host response\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_host_response(ctrl, chap); + if (ret) + goto fail2; + + /* DH-HMAC-CHAP Step 3: send reply */ + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP reply\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_reply(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + if (ret < 0) + goto fail2; + + tl = ret; + ret = nvme_auth_send(ctrl, qid, buf, tl); + if (ret) + goto fail2; + + memset(buf, 0, buf_size);+ ret = nvme_auth_receive(ctrl, qid, buf, buf_size, chap->transaction,+ NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_SUCCESS1); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, + "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP failed to receive success1\n", + __func__, qid); + goto out; + } + if (ret > 0) { + chap->status = ret; + goto fail1; + } + + if (ctrl->opts->dhchap_auth) { + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, + "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP controller response\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_ctrl_response(ctrl, chap); + if (ret) + goto fail2; + } + + /* DH-HMAC-CHAP Step 4: receive success1 */ + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP success1\n", + __func__, qid); + ret = nvme_auth_dhchap_success1(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Controller authentication failed */ + goto fail2; + } + tl = ret; + /* DH-HMAC-CHAP Step 5: send success2 */ + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP success2\n", + __func__, qid); + tl = nvme_auth_dhchap_success2(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + ret = nvme_auth_send(ctrl, qid, buf, tl); + if (!ret) + goto out; + +fail1:+ dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP failure1, status %x\n",+ __func__, qid, chap->status); + goto out; + +fail2:+ dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "%s: qid %d DH-HMAC-CHAP failure2, status %x\n",+ __func__, qid, chap->status); + tl = nvme_auth_dhchap_failure2(ctrl, chap, buf, buf_size); + ret = nvme_auth_send(ctrl, qid, buf, tl); + +out: + if (!ret && chap->status) + ret = -EPROTO; + if (!ret) { + ctrl->dhchap_hash = chap->hash_id; + } + kfree(buf); + nvme_auth_free(chap); + return ret; +} diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.h b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4950b1cb9470 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2021 Hannes Reinecke, SUSE Software Solutions + */ + +#ifndef _NVME_AUTH_H +#define _NVME_AUTH_H + +const char *nvme_auth_dhgroup_name(int dhgroup_id); +int nvme_auth_dhgroup_pubkey_size(int dhgroup_id); +int nvme_auth_dhgroup_privkey_size(int dhgroup_id); +const char *nvme_auth_dhgroup_kpp(int dhgroup_id); +int nvme_auth_dhgroup_id(const char *dhgroup_name); + +const char *nvme_auth_hmac_name(int hmac_id); +const char *nvme_auth_digest_name(int hmac_id); +int nvme_auth_hmac_id(const char *hmac_name); +int nvme_auth_hmac_len(int hmac_len); + +unsigned char *nvme_auth_extract_secret(unsigned char *dhchap_secret, + size_t *dhchap_key_len); + +#endif /* _NVME_AUTH_H */ diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c index 11779be42186..7ce9b666dc09 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c@@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ bool __nvme_check_ready(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct request *rq,switch (ctrl->state) { case NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING:if (blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq) && nvme_is_fabrics(req->cmd) &&- req->cmd->fabrics.fctype == nvme_fabrics_type_connect)+ (req->cmd->fabrics.fctype == nvme_fabrics_type_connect || + req->cmd->fabrics.fctype == nvme_fabrics_type_auth_send || + req->cmd->fabrics.fctype == nvme_fabrics_type_auth_receive))return true; break; default:@@ -3426,6 +3428,66 @@ static ssize_t nvme_ctrl_fast_io_fail_tmo_store(struct device *dev,static DEVICE_ATTR(fast_io_fail_tmo, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,nvme_ctrl_fast_io_fail_tmo_show, nvme_ctrl_fast_io_fail_tmo_store);+#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_AUTH +struct nvmet_dhchap_hash_map { + int id; + const char name[15]; +} hash_map[] = { + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA256, + .name = "hmac(sha256)", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA384, + .name = "hmac(sha384)", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_HASH_SHA512, + .name = "hmac(sha512)", }, +}; + +static ssize_t dhchap_hash_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_map); i++) { + if (hash_map[i].id == ctrl->dhchap_hash) + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", hash_map[i].name); + } + return sprintf(buf, "none\n"); +} +DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dhchap_hash); + +struct nvmet_dhchap_group_map { + int id; + const char name[15]; +} dhgroup_map[] = { + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_NULL, + .name = "NULL", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_2048, + .name = "ffdhe2048", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_3072, + .name = "ffdhe3072", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_4096, + .name = "ffdhe4096", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_6144, + .name = "ffdhe6144", }, + {.id = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_DHGROUP_8192, + .name = "ffdhe8192", }, +}; + +static ssize_t dhchap_dhgroup_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dhgroup_map); i++) { + if (hash_map[i].id == ctrl->dhchap_dhgroup) + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", dhgroup_map[i].name); + } + return sprintf(buf, "none\n"); +} +DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dhchap_dhgroup); +#endif + static struct attribute *nvme_dev_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_reset_controller.attr, &dev_attr_rescan_controller.attr, @@ -3447,6 +3509,10 @@ static struct attribute *nvme_dev_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_reconnect_delay.attr, &dev_attr_fast_io_fail_tmo.attr, &dev_attr_kato.attr, +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_AUTH + &dev_attr_dhchap_hash.attr, + &dev_attr_dhchap_dhgroup.attr, +#endif NULL };@@ -3470,6 +3536,10 @@ static umode_t nvme_dev_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,return 0; if (a == &dev_attr_fast_io_fail_tmo.attr && !ctrl->opts) return 0; +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_AUTH + if (a == &dev_attr_dhchap_hash.attr && !ctrl->opts) + return 0; +#endif return a->mode; } @@ -4581,6 +4651,11 @@ static inline void _nvme_check_size(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvme_smart_log) != 512); BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvme_dbbuf) != 64); BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvme_directive_cmd) != 64); + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_negotiate_data) != 8); + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_challenge_data) != 16); + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_reply_data) != 16); + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_success1_data) != 16); + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_success2_data) != 16); } diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c index a5469fd9d4c3..6404ab9b604b 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ int nvmf_connect_admin_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl) union nvme_result res; struct nvmf_connect_data *data; int ret; + u32 result; cmd.connect.opcode = nvme_fabrics_command; cmd.connect.fctype = nvme_fabrics_type_connect;@@ -398,8 +399,18 @@ int nvmf_connect_admin_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)goto out_free_data; } - ctrl->cntlid = le16_to_cpu(res.u16); - + result = le32_to_cpu(res.u32); + ctrl->cntlid = result & 0xFFFF; + if ((result >> 16) & 2) { + /* Authentication required */ + ret = nvme_auth_negotiate(ctrl, NVME_QID_ANY); + if (ret) + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid 0: authentication failed\n"); + else + dev_info(ctrl->device, + "qid 0: authenticated\n");info is too chatty.Hmm. I know I need to work on logging...+ } out_free_data: kfree(data); return ret;@@ -432,6 +443,7 @@ int nvmf_connect_io_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)struct nvmf_connect_data *data; union nvme_result res; int ret; + u32 result; cmd.connect.opcode = nvme_fabrics_command; cmd.connect.fctype = nvme_fabrics_type_connect;@@ -457,6 +469,17 @@ int nvmf_connect_io_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)nvmf_log_connect_error(ctrl, ret, le32_to_cpu(res.u32), &cmd, data); } + result = le32_to_cpu(res.u32); + if ((result >> 16) & 2) { + /* Authentication required */ + ret = nvme_auth_negotiate(ctrl, qid); + if (ret) + dev_warn(ctrl->device, + "qid %u: authentication failed\n", qid); + else + dev_info(ctrl->device, + "qid %u: authenticated\n", qid); + } kfree(data); return ret; } @@ -548,6 +571,9 @@ static const match_table_t opt_tokens = { { NVMF_OPT_NR_POLL_QUEUES, "nr_poll_queues=%d" }, { NVMF_OPT_TOS, "tos=%d" }, { NVMF_OPT_FAIL_FAST_TMO, "fast_io_fail_tmo=%d" }, + { NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_SECRET, "dhchap_secret=%s" }, + { NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_AUTH, "authenticate" }, + { NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_GROUP, "dhchap_group=%s" },Isn't the group driven by the subsystem? also why is there a "authenticate" boolean? what is it good for?Ah. Right. Of course, the 'group' is pointless here.And the 'authenticate' bool is the abovementioned bidirectional authentication.I _do_ need to give it another name.{ NVMF_OPT_ERR, NULL } };@@ -824,6 +850,35 @@ static int nvmf_parse_options(struct nvmf_ctrl_options *opts,} opts->tos = token; break; + case NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_SECRET: + p = match_strdup(args); + if (!p) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + if (strncmp(p, "DHHC-1:00:", 10)) { + pr_err("Invalid DH-CHAP secret %s\n", p); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + kfree(opts->dhchap_secret); + opts->dhchap_secret = p; + break; + case NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_AUTH: + opts->dhchap_auth = true; + break; + case NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_GROUP: + if (match_int(args, &token)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + if (token <= 0) { + pr_err("Invalid dhchap_group %d\n", token); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + opts->dhchap_group = token; + break; default:pr_warn("unknown parameter or missing value '%s' in ctrl creation request\n",p);@@ -942,6 +997,7 @@ void nvmf_free_options(struct nvmf_ctrl_options *opts)kfree(opts->subsysnqn); kfree(opts->host_traddr); kfree(opts->host_iface); + kfree(opts->dhchap_secret); kfree(opts); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_free_options); @@ -951,7 +1007,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_free_options); NVMF_OPT_KATO | NVMF_OPT_HOSTNQN | \ NVMF_OPT_HOST_ID | NVMF_OPT_DUP_CONNECT |\ NVMF_OPT_DISABLE_SQFLOW |\ - NVMF_OPT_FAIL_FAST_TMO) + NVMF_OPT_CTRL_LOSS_TMO |\ + NVMF_OPT_FAIL_FAST_TMO |\ + NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_SECRET |\ + NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_AUTH | NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_GROUP) static struct nvme_ctrl * nvmf_create_ctrl(struct device *dev, const char *buf) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h index a146cb903869..535bc544f0f6 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ enum { NVMF_OPT_TOS = 1 << 19, NVMF_OPT_FAIL_FAST_TMO = 1 << 20, NVMF_OPT_HOST_IFACE = 1 << 21, + NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_SECRET = 1 << 22, + NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_AUTH = 1 << 23, + NVMF_OPT_DHCHAP_GROUP = 1 << 24, }; /** @@ -96,6 +99,8 @@ enum {* @max_reconnects: maximum number of allowed reconnect attempts before removing * the controller, (-1) means reconnect forever, zero means remove* immediately; + * @dhchap_secret: DH-HMAC-CHAP secret + * @dhchap_auth: DH-HMAC-CHAP authenticate controller * @disable_sqflow: disable controller sq flow control * @hdr_digest: generate/verify header digest (TCP) * @data_digest: generate/verify data digest (TCP) @@ -120,6 +125,9 @@ struct nvmf_ctrl_options { unsigned int kato; struct nvmf_host *host; int max_reconnects; + char *dhchap_secret; + int dhchap_group; + bool dhchap_auth; bool disable_sqflow; bool hdr_digest; bool data_digest; diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h index 18ef8dd03a90..bcd5b8276c26 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h @@ -328,6 +328,12 @@ struct nvme_ctrl { struct work_struct ana_work; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_AUTH + u16 transaction; + u8 dhchap_hash; + u8 dhchap_dhgroup;Do multiple controllers in the same subsystem have different params? no, so I think these should be lifted to subsys.It doesn't actually say in the spec; it always refers to the params as being set by the controller. So it could be either; maybe we should ask for clafication at the fmds call.
We should, but I'd be surprised that different controllers in the same subsystem can authenticate difrerently...
