Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:58:14PM -0400: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote: > > Thanks, that should be good. > > > > Do you want me to send a follow-up patch with the two extra checks > > (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE -1)) > swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr) > > tlb_offset < alloc_size > > > > or are we certain this can't ever happen? > > I would love more patches and I saw the previous one you posted. > > But we only got two (or one) weeks before the next merge window opens > so I am sending to Linus the one that was tested with NVMe and crypto > (see above). > > That is the > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb.git/commit/?h=stable/for-linus-5.14 > > And then after Linus releases the 5.14 - I would love to take your > cleanup on top of that and test it? That sounds good to me, will send with proper formatting after release. -- Dominique
