Re: Lockless /dev/random - Performance/Security/Stability improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The basic ideas here look good to me; I will look at details later.
Meanwhile I wonder what others might think, so I've added some to cc
list.

One thing disturbs me, wanting to give more control to
"the user who should be free to choose their own security/performance tradeoff"

I doubt most users, or even sys admins, know enough to make such
choices. Yes, some options like the /dev/random vs /dev/urandom choice
can be given, but I'm not convinced even that is necessary. Our
objective should be to make the thing foolproof, incapable of being
messed up by user actions.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux