On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:03:58AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> @@ -78,6 +85,7 @@ static inline void sev_es_init_vc_handling(void) { }
> static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
> static inline bool sev_es_active(void) { return false; }
> +static inline bool sev_snp_active(void) { return false; }
Leftover from the previous version, can go.
> +bool sev_feature_enabled(unsigned int type)
> +{
> + switch (type) {
> + case SEV: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED;
> + case SEV_ES: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED;
> + case SEV_SNP: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED;
> + default: return false;
> + }
> +}
Yeah, btw, we might even do a generic one, see:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YLkcIuL2qvo0hviU@xxxxxxx
and the following mail.
But that doesn't matter as sev_feature_enabled()'s body can go into
sev_protected_guest_has() or whatever we end up calling it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
