On 22/04/2021 13:22, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > It was <2021-04-22 czw 12:46>, when Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 22/04/2021 12:41, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even >>> the call returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed >>> on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced. >> >> It's exactly the same as Dinghao's patch: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20200522011659.26727-1-dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx/ >> which you reviewed. It has even the same commit msg >> (although it's difficult to be creative here). >> >> I think it's better to resend his patch instead. > > It isn't the same because it uses pm_runtime_put_noidle() as discussed > here[1], applied here[2] and advised here[2]. Dinghao didn't prepare > v3[4] for exynos. Thanks, makes sense but then I would prefer Marek's approach of pm_runtime_resume_and_get(). Best regards, Krzysztof
