On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:04:10PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> A write from the hypervisor goes through the RMP checks. When the
> hypervisor writes to pages, hardware checks to ensures that the assigned
> bit in the RMP is zero (i.e page is shared). If the page table entry that
> gives the sPA indicates that the target page size is a large page, then
> all RMP entries for the 4KB constituting pages of the target must have the
> assigned bit 0.
Hmm, so this is important: I read this such that we can have a 2M
page table entry but the RMP table can contain 4K entries for the
corresponding 512 4K pages. Is that correct?
If so, then there's a certain discrepancy here and I'd expect that if
the page gets split/collapsed, depending on the result, the RMP table
should be updated too, so that it remains in sync.
For example:
* mm decides to group all 512 4K entries into a 2M entry, RMP table gets
updated in the end to reflect that
* mm decides to split a page, RMP table gets updated too, for the same
reason.
In this way, RMP table will be always in sync with the pagetables.
I know, I probably am missing something but that makes most sense to
me instead of noticing the discrepancy and getting to work then, when
handling the RMP violation.
Or?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
