Sumit, ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> > In this case why would one prefer to use CAAM when you have standards > compliant TPM-Chip which additionally offers sealing to specific PCR > (integrity measurement) values. I don't think we can dictate what good/sane solutions are and which are not. Both CAAM and TPM have pros and cons, I don't see why supporting both is a bad idea. >> > IMHO allowing only one backend at the same time is a little over simplified. >> >> It is, but I'd rather leave this until it's actually needed. >> What can be done now is adopting a format for the exported keys that would >> make this extension seamless in future. >> > > +1 As long we don't make multiple backends at runtime impossible I'm fine and will happily add support for it when needed. :-) Thanks, //richard
