> On Nov 6, 2020, at 9:10 AM, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/20 1:05 AM, Nick Terrell wrote:
>> From: Nick Terrell <terrelln@xxxxxx>
>> Move away from the compatibility wrapper to the zstd-1.4.6 API. This
>> code is functionally equivalent.
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/zstd.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
>> index a7367ff573d4..6b466e090cd7 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/refcount.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> -#include <linux/zstd_compat.h>
>> +#include <linux/zstd.h>
>> #include "misc.h"
>> #include "compression.h"
>> #include "ctree.h"
>> @@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static void zstd_calc_ws_mem_sizes(void)
>> zstd_get_btrfs_parameters(level, ZSTD_BTRFS_MAX_INPUT);
>> size_t level_size =
>> max_t(size_t,
>> - ZSTD_CStreamWorkspaceBound(params.cParams),
>> - ZSTD_DStreamWorkspaceBound(ZSTD_BTRFS_MAX_INPUT));
>> + ZSTD_estimateCStreamSize_usingCParams(params.cParams),
>> + ZSTD_estimateDStreamSize(ZSTD_BTRFS_MAX_INPUT));
>> max_size = max_t(size_t, max_size, level_size);
>> zstd_ws_mem_sizes[level - 1] = max_size;
>> @@ -389,13 +389,23 @@ int zstd_compress_pages(struct list_head *ws, struct address_space *mapping,
>> *total_in = 0;
>> /* Initialize the stream */
>> - stream = ZSTD_initCStream(params, len, workspace->mem,
>> - workspace->size);
>> + stream = ZSTD_initStaticCStream(workspace->mem, workspace->size);
>> if (!stream) {
>> - pr_warn("BTRFS: ZSTD_initCStream failed\n");
>> + pr_warn("BTRFS: ZSTD_initStaticCStream failed\n");
>> ret = -EIO;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> + {
>> + size_t ret2;
>> +
>> + ret2 = ZSTD_initCStream_advanced(stream, NULL, 0, params, len);
>> + if (ZSTD_isError(ret2)) {
>> + pr_warn("BTRFS: ZSTD_initCStream_advanced returned %s\n",
>> + ZSTD_getErrorName(ret2));
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> Please don't do this, you can just add size_t ret2 at the top and not put this in a block. Other than that the code looks fine, once you fix that you can add
Thanks for the review, I’ll make that change!
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Josef
